 | Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years. Thanks, CNET Support |
Any person in the country illegally has got to realize they are a target.
If they have children they best make plans for those kids if they get caught.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/09/us/mississippi-immigration-raids-friday/index.html
Discussion is locked
on their backs when they made the decision to come here illegally and put their children at risk in the first place?
IF they make plans for those kids, then it would probably be the first adult parental responsible decision they've made
to the trauma they were already feeling....how proud they must be of their 'professional journalistic' behavior.
What a we supposed to do... let the illegal stay because they have a kid...nope.
The kids a being used as pawns to sway public opinion.
We have social services to care for those kids.
...to hide behind, and that's the same tactic the Liberals are doing right now concerning illegals.
Kids should not be a factor in shipping out some illegal.
meant for the Liberals? Hmmm.
Makes sense. Although the Russian Air Force has a rep for not caring. And Trump is Putin's disciple, they say. If I were a Liberal I'd be careful.
Or were you just hyperbolizing again? In which case, just irrelevant, like your other alt-stuff.
spending to stop the invasion now?
How much is he spending to send back the captured invaders?
On top of that is social services' spending for child care.
These illegals should not be here.
The cost of trying to block them from coming in or rounding them up after they are in and shipping them out is unknown to me.
Child care cost another unknown.
Invasion??........That sounds like the Don talking with political stuff.
Estimating 30 million illegals here, that's a lot of train cars.
How to keep them from getting out on the way back home?
Lock them in?
Airplanes would be better, but cost might be prohibitive, although it's not like they are going to force open and jump out a door at 30K feet in the air. It also allows to drop them off further from the border, make it harder for them to get back and run the border again.
Long distance back from Patagonia.
That area could stand to have an increase in population anyway. There's only about 2 million people in the bottom third of South America now anyway. They could certainly take a lot of their own continentals back.
Post was last edited on August 21, 2019 1:13 PM PDT
Cost should be no concern....Make them pay their own way...just like Mexico is paying for the wall, China is paying the tariffs...and on and on
The world according to DJT.
to go home.....not a problem evidently since they paid thousands on their own to GET here illegally in the first place.
Nothing says we have to take them out in mass.
When we get a bus load ship them out.
Fact check. How many of those kids watch CNN? In Spanish? Color or b/w?
They suffer many stressors and CNN likely is far down the list.
IMO. No data to back it up. Presented as fact.
'heartrending soundbites' do they bother with by interviewing kids of American citizens who are sent off to jail and separated from their kids who never knew their parent(s) were committing crimes?
Take your excuses and cram them.....those soundbites are for more liberal adults to sympathize with THEIR and the DEMS agendas.
What data are your looking for here? Are you looking for ANY or are you more interested in posting YOUR soundbite opinions? I just gave you a FACT.....what will YOU do with it? Insist CNN interview THOSE kids, too?
Chowhound
Comic Vine
GameFAQs
GameSpot
Giant Bomb
TechRepublic