The CNET Lounge forum

General discussion

IBM trying to patent profiting from patents

by papachungo13 / October 23, 2007 6:16 AM PDT
Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: IBM trying to patent profiting from patents
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: IBM trying to patent profiting from patents
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse - IBM a ...
by shawnlin / October 23, 2007 6:31 AM PDT

in which priority does IBM management think it is?

I think it's:
1) for-profit corporation
2) technology developer
3) law firm


Collapse -
ans: All of the above!
by papachungo13 / October 23, 2007 7:18 AM PDT
In reply to: IBM a ...

I should have stated that I am an employee...

For Profit:

Didn't do too badly this quarter

Technology Developer:

We do a lot of R&D - we are in the top 3 annually in patent filings
If I'm not mistaken, I do believe we supply NASA with stuff (the processor on at least one Mars rover was developed by us)
We have one of the largest (if not the largest) patent portfolios in the world.

Law Firm:

We do have more lawyers than some medium sized law firms.


Collapse -
(NT) right it is all three...but in what order of priority?...
by shawnlin / October 23, 2007 7:39 AM PDT
In reply to: ans: All of the above!
Collapse -
by Renegade Knight / October 23, 2007 10:00 AM PDT
In reply to: IBM a ...

My experience with IBM is limited to the days when they had PC's. However they viewed themselves as a Market Pioneer, Leader, and Powerhouse. They conducted themselves as captains of the industry who's lead we lesser mortals (only being resellers of their overpriced and underpowreed PC's...). I envied them, mostly their sheer Nose in the Air, Holier than Thoug and getting away wiht it attitude. Ultimately I tried to be an employee, chased it down, got the offer and...turned it down. The writing was on the wall. They were going to go down in flames with their PC's. They gave up on PC's inside of two years. Laptops survived a lot longer.

The truth is IBM was an Engineering Company. Back then, they had a solution for every problem that anyone could think of when it related to the personal computer. They could not market their way out of a wet paper bag. IBM flat out sucked at capitalizing on their sheer Engineering power.

Lesser companies came from behind and ate IBM's lunch.

The simple fact that IBM has chosen to try and patent a business model on how to make money on their engineering prowess still tells me that they are an Engineering company and still can't profit on their true value. The very thing that generates all those patents.

IBM then, and perhaps today, did thrive on pioneering field. Nobody else has a solution but IBM did. Customers had to use IBM. That 10% keeps them thriving. The 90% of everything else they don't build on is just money on the table that lets IBM's competitors stay in business.

Patententing a way to make money with patents. Only IBM would think that their idea is original...this is one of their weak points. (If it wasn't, IBM would make more money than anyone else in the world because they have more products than anyone else in the world...)

Collapse -
wow - thanks!
by shawnlin / October 23, 2007 10:20 AM PDT
In reply to: IBM

that's a great summary and perspective RK!

regarding the patents that they hold - I read and saw the picture of a patent for an unmanned aerial vehicle. nothing in particular - just the general concept...the patent applicant was IBM. When I saw that - I just threw my hands in the air with disbelief and, "What the heck does IBM have to do with UAVs!?????!!!" nutty sometimes, just nutty.


Collapse -
Great analysis
by papachungo13 / October 23, 2007 10:41 PM PDT
In reply to: IBM

You've said pretty much what I've chosen not to RK. Until I stop working for them, I'll voice my opinions to management only.

What do we have to do with UAVs Shalin? Nothing except for the fact that there may be a problem that technology can solve, and that one of our engineering teams envisioned it. You can compare it to say, the research work done with the excimer laser, which is now used in angioplasty and optical correction surgery.

Popular Forums
Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
Laptops 21,181 discussions
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
Phones 17,137 discussions
Security 31,287 discussions
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
Windows 10 2,657 discussions


Help, my PC with Windows 10 won't shut down properly

Since upgrading to Windows 10 my computer won't shut down properly. I use the menu button shutdown and the screen goes blank, but the system does not fully shut down. The only way to get it to shut down is to hold the physical power button down till it shuts down. Any suggestions?