Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years.

Thanks,

CNET Support

General discussion

I5 or I7

Aug 15, 2010 9:15PM PDT

I will not be building my computer, I am too long removed from my A+ to remember which end is up. I am in no way a gamer at all, but I am looking for a strong machine that will carry me for many years without becoming obsolete. I am looking at a Dell Studio XPS 9000 with I7-920, 1TB HD, 8 gig Ram, 1 TB External HD, and Printer for about 1300.00 including tax. Is this overkill for a non-gamer. Tomorrow is my birthday and my current XP system is a AMD Athlon 64 3000+ with 1 gig Ram and a 80 gig HD.

Discussion is locked

- Collapse -
Big jump
Aug 16, 2010 8:09AM PDT

Only you can tell if you need that kind of horse-power/ram/storage.

Not to mention how fat your wallet is.
----------------
that will carry me for many years without becoming obsolete

It's obsolete before you buy it.
For the non-gamer the killer is when MS stops support for the OS.

- Collapse -
overkill... yes
Aug 16, 2010 11:17AM PDT

a core i5 is either a virtual quad cpu (via hyperthreading) or a true quad core... either is plenty fast considering your existing pc. if you get the itch next year for more horsepower, a core i7-7xx will drop right into the mobo, no fuss, no muss.

the i5 are intel's mainstream (and lower priced) processors and are designed to meet the needs of most users. you only "need" an i7 if you're doing very cpu-intensive, thread aware tasks (pro cad/cam, pro 3d imaging, pro video transcoding, etc). i suggest you scale back to an i5 and save your cash.

btw, all desktop i3's and i5's use the same socket (lga 1156). the diff between the baby "i"s for the desktop is:
i3 - dual core with hyperthreading
i5-600 - dual core with hyperthreading and turbo boost (automatically overclocks when needed)
i5-7xx - true quad core
i7-8xx for lga 1156 - true quad core with hyperthreading for 8 virual cpus and turbo boost

- Collapse -
I5 vs I7
Aug 16, 2010 8:40PM PDT

Thanks that is the kind of info I need. I have to admit I have got a wee bit behind on which processor is which. Have most of the bugs been worked out of Windows 7 yet, and what can I expect from it compared to XP.

- Collapse -
W7
Aug 27, 2010 10:01AM PDT

I am sorta advanced beginner, and I like Windows 7. Have been running it ever since the Release Candidate versions. The first release was better than Vista ever was and the version they released for sale to public had a lot less "bugs" than XP did when it came out. Some older hardware that worked on XP may have problems, but if it works with VISTA, usually no problem.
I don't know just how to compare it to XP, except to expect some learning curve. I repeat, by the time I ran W7 6 month, I liked it better than XP.

- Collapse -
reply
Aug 16, 2010 9:30PM PDT

I prefer always a new thing and i want to go for i7

- Collapse -
I5 or I7
Aug 26, 2010 9:46PM PDT

Would you all buy Dell or have a machine built locally? I see they offer a scaled down MS Office for free. I only use Word and Excel.

- Collapse -
Bang for the Buck
Aug 27, 2010 12:18AM PDT

Home work time....compare Dell/price and local/price.

I have a Dell I5/750.....works fine.

I bought it because a local merchant was having a sale.

Seems Dell was changing the model number.

Same product....different name.

The merchant was clearing their shelves.

If you go with Dell....you get a pkg plus a few options.

If you go local.....you can build exactly what you want.

Your call.....compromise.....bang for the buck.

- Collapse -
I5 or I7
Aug 27, 2010 11:27AM PDT

Bang, I seem to be bouncing between the I5 750 and the I7 860.

- Collapse -
860
Aug 28, 2010 10:34AM PDT

Looks like it's an extra 90 bucks.

If it's in the budget......go for it.

Just an opinion based on the 750 I'm looking at.

After watching perf numbers for the past few months....I doubt Joe Average will ever seriously stress this cpu.

This machine came with 6 GB of ram.

I doubt that Joe will ever have a need for that kind of ram.

You may not be Joe Average.........

- Collapse -
Get the best.
Sep 27, 2010 1:39AM PDT

Chances are that if you are looking at an i5 or i7 that you are about to make a significant purchase. On the surface, the answer seems simple enough. Since any new technology that you buy today is obsolete by the time you open the box, it is best to by the most advanced you can afford. There are a couple of caveats to that answer however. If the cost is significantly less, you may opt for the "dumbed down" version. You may not need the advanced model but chances are that you will sooner than you think. The other thing to consider is the length of time you intend to use your new purchase as your primary technology. If you update within 2-3 years, there is not much reason to pay the extra. Beyond 2-3 years, "the better, the better." Getting the latest and best will probably keep you satisfied for the next (perhaps) 5 years.

If you buy something at half the cost but replace it twice as fast, you are pretty much at a wash. If cost is your main motivator, the best bang for your buck is year old technology. You can employ the "get it cheap, use it for a year, get a new cheap one" strategy.

If performance is what you are looking for, buy the best and enjoy it for as long as you can.

One last note: If you are just looking to play solitaire, buy a deck of cards.

- Collapse -
I5 vs I7
Sep 27, 2010 9:14AM PDT

Now some guys half got me talked into building my own machine. I understand Sandy Bridge will not come with a big bump in price.