73 total posts
(Page 1 of 3)
Thanks for spreading them some more?
Somone else was bound to do it..
Somone else was bound to do it..
If you waited until they did, you could complain about the lies AND you could complain about them spreading them.
A 2 for 1 sale.
Your idea, you go for it.
It looks like he figured out Dan's plan too !!!!!
Were there any items on the list that I've commented about?
I stopped reading it because so many were unsourced regarding who in the major media ever made them and the supporting statements were conjecture or unsourced as well.
is that your out? Your plausible deniability?
You know of course that these smears have been done via the leftist websites like Kos and Michael Moore and a myriad of Obama surrogates, to an extent abetted by the Obama campaign itself, which links to some of the stories. It's spread via e-mail and so forth.
The major media has been somewhat complicit but they are not the vanguard.
You can pretend it hasn't happened and isn' t happening all you want. That is your right. Very nasty folks these Democrats.
Could you point me to examples of your suspected attacks on the outlets you've mentioned?
Not playing your game...
About our little sweetheart? Shame on the perps!
But can she face the Heat of the Oval Office?
The question is, can Obama?
I doubt it.
Then why the concern about the little list?
One can either take the heat or one can't.
It shows how desperate and despicable her detractors are...
Has ZERO to do with her taking heat. She's handled it admirably, while the opposition is in fear and panic.
I don't deny that she has.
For that very reason it is important that this treating her as if she is a puppy needing protection should stop.
She positioned herself as a pit bull, but the decision by those around her to h send out signals that she is so vulnerable to need protection and incapable of handling amd bumps along the way is damaging.
You as a male might see that as a gentlemanly approach, but I see it as a signal that this lady , for all of her strengths, still might not be strong enough exude strength to world leaders.
No one is treating her....
as a puppy who should be protected. Where do you get that?
the decision by those around her to h send out signals that she is so vulnerable to need protection and incapable of handling amd bumps along the way is damaging.
What decision was that? Made by whom? Can you support that charge?
Is it okay that the opposition is spreading lies and smearing her and her family?
Should no one object to that?
She might have positioned herself as a "pit bull" but that is not license to attack her daughter or her baby, is it?
What on earth does this have to do with her fitness for office?
to put it bluntly
the lady has put her head on the block (along with any other candidate in the race) and people (rightly or wrongly) will do their best to chop it off
that's the way it goes.....
IMO, it's just a waste of time spreading or repeating all the stories you hear/read
life is good....
There are rules of behavior that make the society fun. Continued lying about a person breaks the rules. Pointing out the lies and smears is perfectly valid. She has been hammered to an unprecedented degree.
Obama's troops get all bent out of shape when anyone says peep against him.
You are defending the indefensible? IMO, that is the waste of time.
defending the indefensible?
go find a wind mill
Very well reasoned.
You ARE defending the indefensible. And you can't even defend that.
and you are helping to spread it
if you had the sense you were born with, you would see that my post described the status quo of the political "stage"...
good, bad or indifferent, love it or leave it, that's what you have!
you posting your little list is, IMO, the equivalent of the old codgers who sit by the stove and mumble and grumble and spit on the floor, and there will always be the one who says "didja hear?........."
and god forbid that you accuse him of helping to spread the slime a little more...
if you had the sense you were born with
Is it a Moderators role to insult members?
I would not have thought so. Your criticisms are completely invalid anyway. You just didn't get it (and hardy the first time).
WHY are you a Mod here?
is it a members role to insult moderators?
or other members?
deja-vu all over again
re: Continued lying about a person breaks the rules
You mean lies like... let's say... a person's religion or their citizenship status ?
There is a difference between lies and questions....
both those things ARE legitimate questions that have not been answered in Obama's case.
And as far as we know the McCain campaign itself has not been involved in this kind of thing (though it appears the Hillary Clinton campaign may have been during the primaries). The Obama website has linked to some of these stories.
BUT, has anyone accused Obama's wife of faking a pregnancy for example to cover for a pregnant daughter, or of endangering her child in the womb, or of her husband having sex with her daughter? The magnitude has been way, way more against Palin than Obama.
It's clearly an instance of running scared.
re: not been answered
Obama says he is Christian but his word is not good enough to settle the question.
Palin says the baby was not her daughter's and her word is good enough to settle the question.
It is clearly an instance of fostering a double standard.
The reality is that both questions are ridiculous. The fact that you validate the one while decrying the other speaks to you willingness to sustain the atmosphere of mud slinging. Shame on you.
You are wrong. Obama has said things about his religious upbringing that contradict known facts. I don't claim he is not a Christian, just that it is a legitimate question given what is known. There is NO evidence of any kind to support the rumors about Palin's daughter, etc.
Obama could very easily put to rest any question of his citizenship and yet has not done so. Why?
And of course you have conveniently ignored ther rest of what I said in my post.
Shame on you.
Back to Speakeasy forum
(Page 1 of 3)