Speakeasy forum

General discussion

I know we have a mod who lives in Israel...

by Terry Browne / December 28, 2008 7:08 PM PST

but does that make it any different than talking Palin and Obama? Is it right what Iseral is doing? Is it right to murder 300 people in the name of Iseral?

Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: I know we have a mod who lives in Israel...
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: I know we have a mod who lives in Israel...
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
You could also ask.....
by EdHannigan / December 28, 2008 7:59 PM PST

is it right to fire missiles indiscriminately at civilian areas in Israel? Is it right to launch those missiles from civilian neighborhoods?

Collapse -
Like Iseral is doing?
by Terry Browne / December 28, 2008 8:13 PM PST

And above all, is it right what Iseral is doing? That requires a YES or NO...

Collapse -
I doubt if you will get it.
by Kees Bakker / December 28, 2008 8:19 PM PST
In reply to: Like Iseral is doing?

Not such a simple question if it seems.

Kees

Collapse -
Israel
by EdHannigan / December 28, 2008 8:22 PM PST
In reply to: Like Iseral is doing?

Is it right what Hamas is doing and has been doing. That is also the question.


You seem rather one-sided here.

Collapse -
Contradictory advice.
by Kees Bakker / December 28, 2008 8:28 PM PST
In reply to: Israel

?You have heard that it was said, ?An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.? But I say to you, Do not resist an evildoer, But if anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn the other also; and if anyone wants to sue you and take your coat, give your cloak as well; and if anyone forces you to go one mile, go also the second mile.?

Moreover, it's difficult to say who really started the conflict, so who is retaliating whom.

Kees

Collapse -
Remember neither side is Christian
by Diana Forum moderator / December 28, 2008 10:06 PM PST
In reply to: Contradictory advice.

I don't understand the Arab world. It seems to be OK for Muslims to blow up anyone they want, even each other (this includes civilians).

But heaven forbid if anyone retaliates and kills a Muslim. It's also the other person's fault if the killers set up shop in civilian areas and a few civilians get killed along with the killers. But it's normal for civilians to get killed by the Muslims (Muslim and non-Muslim alike).

I don't hear any condemnation from the Muslim world for Hamas starting the shooting by firing rockets into Israel. Just for Israel for shooting back.

Diana

Collapse -
Also, the "who started it" question
by critic411 / December 28, 2008 10:31 PM PST

Who broke the latest "ceasefire" and who targets citizens?

Collapse -
Actually the U.N. started it....
by C1ay / December 28, 2008 10:41 PM PST
Collapse -
How can a resolution
by James Denison / December 29, 2008 7:48 AM PST

that was never finished, be called a "resolution"? And have a number?!

Collapse -
Haven't you noticed?
by C1ay / December 29, 2008 9:23 AM PST
In reply to: How can a resolution

That's a common theme with U.N. resolutions. They sit around and talk about what needs to be done, they write it down, they vote on it and then everyone does what they want no matter what the resolution says. That's why Saddam threw out the weapons inspectors that were mandated by a U.N. resolution.

Collapse -
Let's say it started with ...
by Kees Bakker / December 28, 2008 10:46 PM PST

Theodor Herzl, although he built upon predecessors.

But you can also say it started back in the year 135 with the diaspora, when many Jewish people left what's now Israel and Palestina after they were defeated by the Romans.

From then on, it continued in quite understandable steps until it reached the current mess.

Kees

Collapse -
that's too easy.
by James Denison / December 29, 2008 7:46 AM PST

When someone tosses garbage in your yard first, they are to blame. When they keep tossing garbage in your yard, they are still to blame. If one day you take and toss all the garbage back and kick his butt, he is still to blame, but at least he got what was coming to him.

Collapse -
Christianity isn't the issue, common humanity is.
by Ziks511 / December 29, 2008 8:54 AM PST

Israelis for years behaved quietly in between defending themselves from attack. It is only since the establishment of a long term terrorist threat, beginning with Yasser Arafat and the PLO, who was permitted to address the UN with a pistol strapped to his hip (speaking of double standards) and its children in Black September and Hamas and Hezbollah and Al Qaeda who are the issue. And I don't believe they truly represent majority Islamic opinion, though I may be wrong about that, but probably not by much.

Islam is not a monolith. It is not even like the Catholic church or any other church except perhaps for the Baptist confederations of churches (watch the hate mail fly). Each imam interprets the Q'ran in his own way. Yes, there are common threads between some imams, but mostly differences are buried at the moment as the more militant side carries on its war against Israel and the United States. Should something change their focus they would be arguing with one another just like they were before 1972.

Christianity was and is like this. Roman Catholics versus Orthodox Catholics versus Protestants, and if you've noticed some of the Christians here at SE deny that mainline Christian churches are Christian at all. At least that's what they argued to me. But Christianity which had its own endless wars finally grew out of that in the 18th Century. Now Islam is 600 years newer than Christianity. I don't think we can expect it to settle down a lot quicker than it took Christians which gives us another 3 or 4 hundred years to wait.

Rob

Collapse -
I wasn't saying that Christianity was the issue
by Diana Forum moderator / December 29, 2008 12:41 PM PST

I was referring to the statement about turning the other cheek. I was simply saying that neither side was a follower of Christ's teachings.

I know about the bloody history of Christianity. I also know that fo the first four leaders of Islam after Muhammad, two were killed by rival factions. So the religion might be newer than Christianity but the blood started flowing a lot sooner.

It is amazing to me that a religion that was considered the most enlightened one during the Middle Ages. The wealthy wanted a Muslim or Jewish doctor; definitely not a Christian one. Also the Muslims were in the forefront of science. Now so many want to go back to the worse parts of the Middle Ages and before.

Diana

Collapse -
Like the man said,
by James Denison / December 29, 2008 7:47 AM PST
In reply to: Contradictory advice.

"you only have two cheeks to slap, after that, hell's to pay".

Collapse -
you only have 2?
by JP Bill / December 29, 2008 9:23 AM PST
In reply to: Like the man said,

What do you sit on?..besides a chair?

Wink

Collapse -
Quoting things out of context usually winds up getting
by Kiddpeat / December 29, 2008 12:11 PM PST
In reply to: Contradictory advice.

things wrong. When Jesus said those words, he was speaking to individuals. He was not speaking to governments. As Paul, speaking from his intimate understanding of the teachings of Jesus, later said, the government is given a sword by God Himself. It is government's responsibility to use that sword to protect its population, and to secure justice. There is no God given mandate for the government to "turn the other check" and allow evil doers to deprive its people of justice and security.

Collapse -
Mohandas Gandhi said .........................
by Dango517 / December 29, 2008 4:34 PM PST
In reply to: Contradictory advice.
Collapse -
Gandhi...
by EdHannigan / December 29, 2008 7:30 PM PST

could be quite the cornball. IF he was responsible for that old bromide, he can be forgiven.

Collapse -
without such law
by James Denison / December 29, 2008 11:27 PM PST

eventually only the bully would retain sight and everyone else would be blind. Sort of a "two strikes" law.

Collapse -
I guess, based on your quote, that Gandhi did not
by Kiddpeat / December 29, 2008 11:44 PM PST

understand what the Bible is saying.

When the Bible uses the "eye for an eye" phrase, it is saying that the response to a wrong should be limited and proportional. If you lose your eye, you cannot kill in retaliation. Your response, if any, must be limited and proportional to the wrong inflicted on you.

The Bible did not say that the eye must or should be taken in retaliation. The desirable response to an inflicted injury was simply not the focus of that particular writing.

Collapse -
Not at all
by Terry Browne / December 28, 2008 8:29 PM PST
In reply to: Israel

Just asking if Iseral is right to take the measures that they have taken? It IS a simple yes or no...

Does Iseral have the right to exist? Absolutely!

Collapse -
Could you at least make an effort....
by Josh K / December 29, 2008 6:37 AM PST
In reply to: Not at all

....to spell "Israel" correctly? It would be a nice show of respect for a country you believe has a right to exist and defend itself.

Collapse -
Yes
by James Denison / December 29, 2008 7:49 AM PST
In reply to: Not at all

Everyone's been telling you that.

Collapse -
(NT) Does Israel have the right to self defense? Absolutely -Rob
by Ziks511 / December 29, 2008 9:02 AM PST
In reply to: Not at all
Collapse -
(NT) Total number of rockets launched from Gaza has passed 300. R
by Ziks511 / December 30, 2008 7:11 AM PST
In reply to: Not at all
Collapse -
And how many deaths on each side?
by Terry Browne / December 30, 2008 12:16 PM PST

Last thing I heard was 4 Israelis and over 360 Palestinians...

I don't expect you to feel sorry for the Palestinian people at all, but you see the number of rockets is not the ultimate count. It's the lives that have been taken.

Collapse -
simple
by oldie and goody / December 30, 2008 12:46 PM PST

all Hamas has to do is quit sending rockets into Israel! Israel didn't bomb Gaza until Hamas broke the truce and started terrorist acts.

Collapse -
a slight analogy
by jonah jones / December 30, 2008 7:14 PM PST

the death of a thousand cuts......


you want Israel to stand by and bleed to death

no way!


they want to "live by the sword"?

let them die by the fastest means possible


.,

Collapse -
The rockets didn't just start yesterday...
by grimgraphix / December 31, 2008 10:33 AM PST
In reply to: a slight analogy

Out of curiosity... how many years has Hamas claimed responsibility for lobbing missiles of all sorts into Israel? Terry makes a case for 4 fatalities versus 390+ and counting... as an illustration of how unreasonable Israel's response has been.

But the reality is that Hamas has been involved in such attacks for many years. Is that not correct?

The situation has changed only because Hamas now has its' own small country to stage attacks from. Hamas claims authenticity and credibility for its position as a representational authority of the Palestinian peoples, but acts as no responsible government would by cravenly attacking a much more well armed opponent from behind civilian shields. Unfortunately though, it is my understanding that Hamas has earned some small gratitude from the Palestinian populations because they have provided better services to the population than the Palestinian Authority has in past years. I am not so sure that if the Palestinian ground forces move into Gaza... that the civilian populations will not rise up and give more support to Hamas than it might really deserve. I hope and pray that will not be the case for everyone on both sides.

Popular Forums
icon
Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
icon
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
icon
Laptops 21,181 discussions
icon
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
icon
Phones 17,137 discussions
icon
Security 31,287 discussions
icon
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
icon
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
icon
Windows 10 2,657 discussions

CNET FORUMS TOP DISCUSSION

Help, my PC with Windows 10 won't shut down properly

Since upgrading to Windows 10 my computer won't shut down properly. I use the menu button shutdown and the screen goes blank, but the system does not fully shut down. The only way to get it to shut down is to hold the physical power button down till it shuts down. Any suggestions?