General discussion

Homeland Security 'Privacy panel' widely criticized

Discussion is locked

Reply to: Homeland Security 'Privacy panel' widely criticized
PLEASE NOTE: Do not post advertisements, offensive materials, profanity, or personal attacks. Please remember to be considerate of other members. If you are new to the CNET Forums, please read our CNET Forums FAQ. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Reporting: Homeland Security 'Privacy panel' widely criticized
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
- Collapse -
21st Century "Star Chamber"

Good post DK. Just what we need?government bureaucrats and pseudo-bureaucrats appointed by DHS to protect citizens from abuse by DHS and the Three Letter Agencies.

Definitely 20 foxes selected to guard the privacy chicken coop.

Only 130+ people out of ~280,000,000 citizens applied. I don?t like that resume submission math at all.

I concur with Counterpane Internet Security?s CTO, Bruce Schneier, when he laughs at the 20-member "privacy advocate" list. It?s good for a chuckle or two, but sadly the joke is on you and me. Cool JP

- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) Are you surprised?

CNET Forums

Forum Info