maybe the problem is instead your perception.
![]() | Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years. Thanks, CNET Support |
Discussion is locked
I post what seems most likely to be correct as I balance all the contending views.
Maybe the problem is your perception, or lack of critical thinking, or inclination to despise anything to the left of Ted Cruz which is an awful lot of space, and country. But that's just a thought.
Rob
I saw the stories, didn't consider it worth taking note of much and passed it by.
seems to be that Dan Rather among others presented what they knew was tainted news, whereas Lara Logan only discovered that later, and then corrected it. You may recall she was also the reporter who was brutally raped during one assignment.
"Great post here by Digby on a Lara Logan speech one year ago (and see video) where she exposed herself as a raging, biased hawk on exacting revenge for the Benghazi attack. Digby, the longtime ace blogger, also looks at other Logan statements about Libya and Afghanistan, showing that likely her own bias led to not asking right questions on her star "source." Logan even admits that her boss had to remind her that she was seek the truth and not merely trying to prove her own views.
" "Needless to say, the fact that she fell for such a clearly ridiculous hoax was due to her biases. She shows in that speech that she had already made up her mind about what happened. And 60 Minutes should have been professionally skeptical of her story because of that. Logan's agenda blinded her to the fact that she was being played." " Emphasis mine.
Rob
...what I read is about;
" It came after Jeff Fager, the executive producer, told Michael Calderone of Huff Post that, yes, Dylan Davies had told them he lied to his boss about where he was on the fateful night."
primarily against Fager and Rhodes. I did however offer an indication that Logan had a particular pre-disposition to chase the case at least 10 months before the story aired.
Who went on a witch hunt following the bombing of the Marine Barracks in Lebanon? Was the Administration pilloried? Did they protest Reagan or his Secretary of State or try to destroy either of them? Not remotely.
I'd simply like equal treatment for the President, and the Secretary of State for Democratic and Republican regimes. And, while Colin Powell was criticized, he was treated with far more respect than Hilary Rodham Clinton for his transmitting lies and misinformation before the Nation and the United Nations. The trouble is it was clear that he was lied to, just as Ms Clinton was lied to in her briefings by the CIA et al.
Rob
administration's lies about Benghazi feeling about now........now that the hearings from actual survivors and witnesses to it are talking? Including a tape from Young (R) now dead is released by his family showing that nothing that this administration said matches up with the actual facts of what was happening on the ground?