Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years.

Thanks,

CNET Support

General discussion

Here is a site for the right - It doesn't appear to hold much back :)

Feb 15, 2004 10:31AM PST

Conservatives: Always knew Bush would be great? Think Gephart, Daschle and Clinton are screaming commies? Common Conservative.com is for you. Our magazine offers Republican and Libertarian perspectives on the modern political battlefield. We attack liberalism with both barrels blazing. No syllable-writing contests. No snooty highbrow smugness. And we don't wear little alligators on our sweaters. Our political commentary is dedicated to the average American, who wants politics clear and straight-up. Tired of boring pundits who skirt tough issues?

http://WWW.commonconservative.com

Discussion is locked

- Collapse -
I couldn't resist clicking the link
Feb 16, 2004 12:42AM PST

The photo collage in the "What's on the minds of leading conservatives" link includes Ann Coulter and G. Gordon Liddy. To paraphrase the late Billy Martin, "one's a born liar and the other's convicted." They couldn't do any better than that?

Wink

- Collapse -
Small as the pictures are...
Feb 16, 2004 5:16AM PST
- Collapse -
Re:Small as the pictures are...
Feb 16, 2004 5:21AM PST

I didn't have to look that hard. Maybe my eyesight is just better than yours. Wink

What did you find at the Dean site that you believe is fabricated?

- Collapse -
Re:Re:Small as the pictures are...
Feb 16, 2004 6:07AM PST
Maybe my eyesight is just better than yours.

Good possibility these days.

What did you find at the Dean site that you believe is fabricated?

Most of it--didn't you read any of it? It is almost as warped from reality as the Brady bunch's NRA page.
- Collapse -
Somewhere on there Josh - they showed a face of Kerry changing to frankinstein's monster :)( NT) I thought the graphics clever:)
Feb 16, 2004 6:16AM PST
Happy
- Collapse -
Kerry changed from supporting the President to going against him - from the link
Feb 16, 2004 6:43AM PST
http://www.commonconservative.com/guest8.html
Saddam's objective was to amass a stockpile of WMD? There shouldn't be "ANY DEBATE WHATSOEVER in the Security Council" or "this Nation." over the issue?
We must have the "courage to do what we believe is right and wise" even if countries like France disagree with us? Is this the same John Kerry who is now running for President? Yes indeed, the Senator supported the President's policies regarding Iraq as recently as October of 2002 when he announced that "The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to... defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq." He even voted against an alternative to Bush's Iraq War resolution that would have authorized force only in the event that such an act was sanctioned by the U.N. Security Council.
Not long afterward, however, he was quoted as saying that he would not "support the President to proceed unilaterally" when it came to military action against Iraq. This obvious shifting of gears by Senator Kerry should come as no surprise to anyone who read the March 25, 1991, edition of the New Republic. In that publication, quotes from two different letters appeared which were written by Kerry to a man named Wallace Carter, a constituent from the his home state. January 22, 1991 "Thank you for contacting me to express your opposition... to the early use of military force by the US against Iraq. I share your concerns. On January 11, I voted in favor of a resolution that would have insisted that economic sanctions be given more time to work and against a resolution giving the president the immediate authority to go to war."