I've readily worked with Microsoft Office files on my Mac. I frequently take files from my Mac to a secretary using Windows to proofread and print.
![]() | Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years. Thanks, CNET Support |
Discussion is locked
I've readily worked with Microsoft Office files on my Mac. I frequently take files from my Mac to a secretary using Windows to proofread and print.
... I have had the delightful experience of taking an Excel spreadsheet (that was part of an automated application) home and making two hours worth of changes to it, bringing it back and find it was not acceptable to be merged back into the system and therefore having to make the changes all over again on the Windows PC at work.
I was subsequently able to take the same sheet home, load it on a Windows machine, and make changes and successfully able to merge it back into the application.
I later found there was some difference in some of the functions and macros in the version of Excel on the Mac versus the one on the Windows platform that caused the issue.
It is best to be safe and not switch platforms -- even with MS Office files. Word is easier -- fewer Macros and functions to deal with (like normally none).
Yes, there are many occasions where you will have no trouble -- but when you are in a crunch, trouble is almost guaranteed. Isn't that a corollary of Murphy's law or something?
Apple hardware is probably the best out there, and I have seen many who will buy a Mac and install Windows as a dual boot. That's probably the best, but highest cost option.
That said, since switching to Windows 8, I have not had the problems you've described, which are quite typical with Windows 7 and earlier. So here are your options, from lowest to highest cost:
Lowest cost = Chromebook (lacks software, but does basics you've described)
Low cost = Inexpensive non-touch screen Windows 8 laptop - much more flexibility and privacy than Chromebook.
Mid-cost = Windows 8 touchscreen laptop or all-in-one (which will have a larger screen)
High cost = high-end Windows 8 or low to high-end Mac
My personal preference is Windows 8 on an HP, but others will swear by Mac, Chrome, or even Linux. I have never had to have my HP's serviced, but have always found their customer service (for ordering) to be fast and efficient. HP laptops are typically significantly less expensive than Apple laptops.
I do realize that your interest is in a laptop......not a desktop, but I was in a similar boat a few years ago.
I've always been a PC user, and a few years ago I was looking for a new laptop.
I "sampled" quite a few via Costco, and their generous return policy. Eventually one of the Managers put the Babbosh on my rental program. Most of them had Windows XP (which I loved), and a few had Windows 7 (which I didn't like as much). I tried ACER, DELL, ASUS, SONY, TOSHIBA, and a few HP's. I really hate to say this, because I have a phobia of DELL products, but that thing was super-fast, and just worked well. I just wasn't comfortable keeping it because years ago they had problems with their batteries, and my Sister had one that crapped-out a week after the 2 year warranty expired.
So I decided to try an APPLE.
I wanted another laptop, but actually ended up with an iMac.
I'm only writing from a PC vs. APPLE perspective.
So I ended up buying this iMac, and I went BIG! I bought a 27" with the 3.4 gig i7 quad core processor, 1 gig for the graphics, and 1 TB hard drive. I bought more ram from Crucial, and upgraded it to 16 gigs (1333mhz DDR3). The Computer came with OS X Lion 10.7
I have cable internet service from the Large local Cable company.
This computer is loaded. The only thing I didn't get was a solid state hard drive. This computer should've been more than I would ever need. I planned on keeping it for a long time, but it just never worked right from day one. It would basically freeze trying to check my e-mail. I couldn't open two windows at the same time, because I would just get the pinwheel/beach ball. Perhaps maybe an upgrade to "Mountain Lion" will have it running the way it was supposed to? Everybody I spoke with loved "Snow Leopard", and said their Mac ran great. Microsoft flubbed with Vista, then "fixed it" with Windows 7, so I know these things happen, but I was trying to get away from all the Service packs, and new Operating systems every 2-3 years that Microsoft is know for. They seem to always put out an un-finished product, then sell you the fix for it later.
Maybe I just had bad timing when I switched to APPLE...........or maybe I just got a Lemon?
I can tell you this much, I've spent 5 times as much money as if I would've if I had just stuck with a PC.
Just my 2 cents (actually $3000.00)
There is a big price difference you must consider, if that is not an issue then go for Apple.
You can browse 20-30 pages at the time, keep the tabs open and switch from one to the next.
The operating system is much more stable than Windows.
The most important issue, you don't have to buy expensive new programs when the operating system is upgrated.
With Apple you upgrade your operating system and the programs installed keep working fine, not so with Windows.
I switched to Apple 4 years ago and don't regret it.
FB
Since Windows 7, Windows is as stable as Mac OS unless you have hardware problems on your computer. Windows XP and earlier were pretty unstable in my experience. If it had not been for Windows 7, I probably would have gone over to Apple too but I didn't have to.
Backward compatibility is something Windows is built on (sometimes to its detriment) so old programs generally work fine when you upgrade the Windows operating system. There are a few exceptions but they are fairly rare. I have 15-year-old programs running just fine under Windows 8. You generally do not have to replace your old programs when you upgrade Windows though some software sellers try to tell you otherwise to make more money.
Windows has never done what Apple did a few years ago when they changed the OS and the platform and everything was immediately obsolete and you had to replace everything to move up.
At the XP, XP was the first consumer OS that we could run 24x7 data collection apps. Mind you we wrote these apps so that may be part of the discussion but prior consumer Windows (1,2,3, 95, 98, ME) were not easy to get stable for unattended data collection. Prior to XP we used Windows NT and before Windows, we had DOS and embedded computers (no real OS except the app we wrote on it!)
Bob
Commercial apps written for business purposes or custom-developed by a business for their special purposes are a whole different animal. In fact, they are more likely to break when you upgrade an OS because they may be built around features specific to an OS version. This is true regardless of the OS.
There are still lots of businesses running XP but they have sometimes painted themselves into a corner as far as updating their computers since modifying their custom software can be expensive and time consuming.
That our custom apps from 2000 are still running today and this includes Windows 8, Windows server 2008 (sorry, no one has gone beyond that.)
The only request we've had is for an Android version.
Bob
I ran data acquisition software 24/7 on Win 2, 3, 95 and NT4 and rarely had problems. As long as the software was well designed AND THE SYSTEMS USED FOR NOTHING ELSE, I could go weeks without rebooting.
As soon as I started using the systems for other tasks, problems galore. The trick is to remember that if the software costs WAY more than the computer, get another computer for more mundane tasks. (Had trouble convincing the accountant of that.)
Hi,
I use MacBokpro for 5 years now, before I had only PS's.
My experience with MAC is very positive. All software I had on PS's has equivalent. My machine did not become low over the years. It got broken couple of times, bur Apple did excellent service and fixed my mac twice. Last time almost all part of my MAC (including screen) ware replaced for $300.
I used up couple C's Dell & IBM, and they are non functional after 3 years of usage.
I would say if it is not for gaming, go with MAC.