Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years.

Thanks,

CNET Support

General discussion

From my inbox

Feb 25, 2010 8:39AM PST

Discussion is locked

- Collapse -
(NT) me to...don't know about "solid"...19
Feb 25, 2010 9:00AM PST
- Collapse -
(NT) 26
Feb 25, 2010 11:24AM PST
- Collapse -
(NT) a very non-committed 5 :)
Feb 25, 2010 12:31PM PST
- Collapse -
(NT) Can't believe I fall in "Baby Boomer" with score of 18
Feb 25, 2010 11:12PM PST
- Collapse -
32!
Feb 25, 2010 11:18PM PST

Almost Gen X, surprisingly!

- Collapse -
476!
Feb 25, 2010 11:21PM PST

I added my scores from all the try together. Wink

- Collapse -
476?
Feb 26, 2010 5:27AM PST

lots of tats, piercings and texts?

- Collapse -
2!
Feb 26, 2010 1:56AM PST

I got 2. I think my unusual situation results in scores with such tests being so far from the norm.

- Collapse -
11 here but not sure about the weighting system
Feb 26, 2010 2:31AM PST

If you read what's used it's heavily weighted in some areas and skips over others that I think are important indicators of growing with the times. It doesn't ask about computer/internet usage at all but looks at technology very narrowly. Folks of all ages have been pulled into the computer age along the way and adopted well though a few are still a bit phobic. So much weight placed on social networking seems a bit odd as it's really, in my observation, still in an infancy state and "hot" in only a very narrow age range. I'm not sure what to make of the tattoo question. Perhaps that's today's answer to what was earlier just non-conformity or the importance of individual identity in youthful dress code.

- Collapse -
piercings, tattoos, cellphone usage,
Feb 26, 2010 5:09AM PST

and then defined social sites. Since I do interact with a couple forums maybe I should have answered yes on those but instead it aimed at places like Facebook, MySpace, etc. Also, someone on welfare would score higher on interaction with govt agencies than someone who isn't. There's a definite bias in the questioning, but is that bias necessary to make it accurate or does it distort the understanding?

- Collapse -
don't feel bad
Feb 26, 2010 5:02AM PST

I actually got a 5.

- Collapse -
(NT) 44
Feb 26, 2010 3:25AM PST
- Collapse -
5, but b. 1928-1945?
Feb 26, 2010 5:38AM PST

I thought I was born in 1951. That's what my parents always told me!

Mark

- Collapse -
7 - Between Silent and Baby Boomer
Feb 26, 2010 5:56AM PST

It probably would have been higher if I had a cell phone (no signal here and don't travel often enough to have the cell phone I do have turned on for anything more than prepaid minutes for short spurts)...also I don't subscribe to the local twice a week newspaper. I read it online for the headline stories instead.

TONI H

- Collapse -
25 or 42 depending ....
Feb 26, 2010 9:44AM PST

I answered the questions accurately, but my answer for recent TV ('No' right now) was atypical. That gave me a 42. Since I do watch at least some TV with my wife during a typical week when my house is not being renovated I changed it to 'Yes' and my score dropped to 25. I was surprised by the size of the change from just ONE question!

- Collapse -
I'm not sure what's passing or failing
Feb 26, 2010 7:26PM PST

It wasn't that long ago....or doesn't seem so....that a song contained the lyric "it's hip to be square". I'm thinking that if one texted that to a "Millennial", they'd stare at the message in confusion.