Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years.

Thanks,

CNET Support

General discussion

Free speech, or illegal noise?

Apr 24, 2005 2:41AM PDT
Woman gets honking mad over receiving horn citation.
(Chronicle login: semods4@yahoo.com; pw = speakeasy)

>>An Oakland woman alleges Berkeley police violated her First Amendment rights when an officer ticketed her last year for honking in support of a labor union's picketing outside the Claremont Resort and Spa to protest rising health care costs and other issues.

Carol Harris, 51, is appealing her $143 "unreasonable use of horn" citation to Berkeley's Police Review Commission.

Harris was among nearly 40 motorists who received tickets beginning shortly before midnight on Aug. 27, accused of violating a California Vehicle Code section prohibiting the use of horns except "when reasonably necessary to insure safe operation" of vehicles or as part of a theft-prevention system.<<

So much for "Honk if you love Jesus!" (To say nothing of when picking up a car-pooler in the rain, or running late). If this were at night, I could see it -- but this was in broad daylight!

-- Dave K, Speakeasy Moderator
click here to email semods4@yahoo.com

The opinions expressed above are my own,
and do not necessarily reflect those of CNET!

Discussion is locked

- Collapse -
Given the specifics,
Apr 24, 2005 11:39PM PDT

it is a demonstration of support. The citations should be thrown out.

The scenarios you listed are very different.

Dan

- Collapse -
I'm guessing ...
Apr 24, 2005 11:41PM PDT

... that if it was a showing of support for a cause you didn't agree with in your neighborhood, you would feel otherwise. Doubtful you will admit that, but we can always keep hope alive for some consistency.

- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) lol how true honk if you agree:)
Apr 25, 2005 1:03AM PDT
- Collapse -
Better yet ...
Apr 25, 2005 1:10AM PDT

... have fun with your laser toys -- drive by and beam them in the windows to show support Wink Harmless right? If a car horn is "speech", this would be by extension ... wink or evil eye Devil

Evie Happy

- Collapse -
It is disturbing that you have
Apr 25, 2005 3:24AM PDT

lived in this country for so long and do not understand the difference between harassment and speech.

Dan

- Collapse -
Apparently there were MANY complaints ...
Apr 25, 2005 3:31AM PDT

... perhaps the people in the neighborhood felt just a little bit harrassed by the rude honking while most were trying to sleep. You can't take out a bullhorn and "speak" in the middle of the night Dan, even in the "City that never sleeps".

- Collapse -
Just because there are complaints does not
Apr 25, 2005 3:39AM PDT

mean that free speech is curtailed. It is apparent that too few people have an appreciation and understanding for the concept.

That's too bad.

Dan

- Collapse -
Too bad you ...
Apr 25, 2005 4:06AM PDT

... don't seem to have an appreciation for the rights of the many to a good night's sleep. The First Amendment protects one from persecution by the government for expressing one's political views/religion/etc. It doesn't guarantee one a podium, or let one speak whereever and whenever they desire. Clearly this was a major nuisance to a great many in the neighborhood.

- Collapse -
Many rights are
Apr 25, 2005 10:37PM PDT

a nuisance, Evie, that does not make them less protected.

I'm not sure where you guys are coming up with the right to a good night's sleep. Is there case law to support your position?

Dan

- Collapse -
Your inability to understand the First Amendment ...
Apr 25, 2005 10:42PM PDT

... makes any further discussion futile.

- Collapse -
Is the First the one that
Apr 26, 2005 12:30AM PDT

guarantees the right to a good night's sleep?

You're just too funny, Evie.

Dan

- Collapse -
Yes the First Amendment itself does just that...
Apr 26, 2005 12:56AM PDT

but you won't grasp the fact until you do your research previously hinted at.

Yell FIRE in a crowded theater and discover for yourself that all speech is not free as the courts have long agreed to various limitations.

You Dan are not funny nor are your posts witty as you seem to think.

- Collapse -
right to a good night's sleep and case law
Apr 26, 2005 12:50AM PDT

Matter of simple fact the answer to your question is YES!

All you need do is a tiny bit of research on "Noise Polution" laws and zoning variances and you will discover a plethora of case law regarding the "right to a good night's sleep".

Now aren't you glad you asked?

- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) but ed will dan grasp the truth
Apr 26, 2005 5:06AM PDT
- Collapse -
How about Memphis...
Apr 26, 2005 10:01AM PDT

How about Memphis, Tennessee. One of the things that their anti-noise ordinance says is that car horns can be used only for safety purposes. This was the situation in the 1960's, and it held.

- Collapse -
So you think political protest and speech depriving
Apr 26, 2005 1:15PM PDT

somone of sleep is better?

Sleep deprivation does contribute to on the job accidents, automobile accidents, loss of control and fights, and the list goes on forever.

Don't forget the right to private property and respect of the owners rights on that property was very important to those that felt harassed by the English governors and miltia to the point they started a civil war to become a new nation.

A right to peace and quiet may not be literally in the constitution, but it certainly falls under the Declaration of Independance proclamations. Something about the common good, pursuit of happiness, life&liberty.

Sorry, free speech does not give anyone the right to hassale me IN MY HOME, even from outside my home. There is such a crime, misdomeaner it may be, as disturbing the peace.

Even if you don't care about someone campaigning for whatever outside your house, that doesn't give you the right to say I shouldn't mind. What is the claim about conservatives are always trying to dictate how everyone lives, and are the only ones doing it? Aruing disturbing people in their homes is freedom of speech is proof IMO that everyone does it for their pet beliefs.

Interferring with rest and peace, especially in my home, is harmful to my health. Sort of like the enironmental poisons so many preach about in fact.


JMO

Roger

click here to email semods4@yahoo.com

- Collapse -
ok dan post your addy
Apr 25, 2005 9:14AM PDT

we can get a deminstration going on at all 24/7 with honking horns remember now you and your neighbors cant sleep, or your children sleep and when somebody calls the cops they can say but dan says its ok its our "freedom" of speach to disturb the peace.

thats why there ordenences for noise .

- Collapse -
But if you go out
Apr 25, 2005 10:38PM PDT

of your way with no other reason but to disturb me then it is not protected speech. See the difference?

Dan

- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) Who decides that this purpose isn't worthy?
Apr 25, 2005 10:43PM PDT
- Collapse -
Harassment is not
Apr 26, 2005 12:32AM PDT

protected speech, Evie.

And you say I have problems understanding free speech. That's rich!

Dan

- Collapse -
we will be demonstrateing
Apr 25, 2005 11:18PM PDT

for the use of horns as free speach, as its our right and evan though its 3 am and your neighbors want to sleep, you said its ok.

now do you see what is free speach and being a law breaker.

honk if you hear me Grin

- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) HONK HONK!
Apr 25, 2005 11:19PM PDT
- Collapse -
I understand.
Apr 26, 2005 12:33AM PDT

You are demonstrating that you do not.

Dan

- Collapse -
(NT) So we campaign to get you to support Bush 24/7.
Apr 26, 2005 1:17PM PDT
- Collapse -
The right to free speech doesn not extend to my property
Apr 25, 2005 10:05AM PDT

IN my house, you do not have the right to stay and preach on anything you like once I ask you to leave. I can have the cops forcefully remove you if you refuse to go.

If you stand on my lawn and I tell you to leave, I can have you removed.

Standing on the street, I may not be able to have you removed, but I have every right to expect your "speech" not intrude into my living room.

Talk all you want, at a reasonable voice on the sidewalk, hand out bills, wave a sign.

DON'T block my access or exit from my property onto a public thoroughfare, DON'T extend you noise into my home or even my vehicle.

Do you claim it's ok to stand on the sidewalk directly in front of your house and to yell asking you to support candidates in the next election at midnight? or for that matter at any time at all?

As the cliche goes, your freedom to swing your arms stops before your hand hits my nose.

Very little difference if they're disturbing INSIDE my residence if it's politcal rally, anti-abortion rally, anti-death penality march, or a bunch of good ole boys hooping and hollering. Or some inconsiderate, rude, no manner jerk blowing a horn when there's no good LEGAL (warning) reason for it.

JMO

Roger

click here to email semods4@yahoo.com

- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) HONK! HONK! LOL
Apr 25, 2005 1:51AM PDT
- Collapse -
You guess wrong.
Apr 25, 2005 3:22AM PDT

Anyone with even a passing familiarity with my position on free speech would have correctly guess the other way.

Dan

- Collapse -
And anyone ...
Apr 25, 2005 3:28AM PDT

... with a passing familiarity with your hypocrisy on many issues, would have guessed with me. Free speech doesn't give people the right to infringe on the rights of others to enjoy their property or even to get a full night's sleep! The article states INORDINATE amount of complaints and she was among nearly FORTY such noisy motorists disrupting the peace. This woman seems to have no basic manners. If she feels so compelled to show her support, she can get out of her car, pick up a sign and peaceably meet and demonstrate.

- Collapse -
Once again you accuse and insult me.
Apr 25, 2005 3:41AM PDT

I suppose the forum members will wait forever and a day for you to provide any substatiation for your statements and the defense of your character?

Dan

- Collapse -
There's the "i" word again
Apr 25, 2005 4:07AM PDT

I can add it to my list of substantiation for you using that word quite a bit.