Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years.

Thanks,

CNET Support

General discussion

Forum redesign will be deployed today 4/22

Apr 21, 2005 8:24AM PDT

It's actually going to happen today!

Please let me know if you find any bugs that we may have over looked. I hope you guys like it!

Thanks everyone!
-Lee

Discussion is locked

- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) you mean tommorow? i hope:)
Apr 21, 2005 8:36AM PDT
- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) WOW, Too soon to tell yet. :|
Apr 21, 2005 9:52AM PDT
- Collapse -
Font size is way too small.
Apr 21, 2005 9:57AM PDT

As of this post, my message marking is not working in SE. Tried refreshing etc. and still, the same thread comes up with a red dot and the same new post I've "read" several times now remains unread.

I do like the "in reply to" link Happy

Evie Happy

- Collapse -
Font size too small. . .
Apr 21, 2005 10:02AM PDT

did I mention the font size is too small?

- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) :-) Font? What font? :-)
Apr 21, 2005 10:08AM PDT
- Collapse -
Not sure its a marking problem after all ...
Apr 21, 2005 10:08AM PDT

... newer short threads are coming up fine. An older one with 100 posts is not marking read, AND it isn't displaying anywhere near the entire 100 posts on the page.

Evie Happy

- Collapse -
Also thought we were getting a
Apr 21, 2005 10:12AM PDT

"back to the top of the page" button too.

- Collapse -
We've added the forum navigation to the bottom of each page
Apr 21, 2005 10:22AM PDT

if that what you are referring to.

Not too sure what back to top of page means and where it would exist. Please clarify for me Rod.

Thanks!

- Collapse -
It means a button, especially on a long
Apr 21, 2005 11:09AM PDT

thread to bring you to the top of the page, such as hitting the "home" key or "page up" key that doesn't always work for some people for some reason Lee. Someone made that suggestion a while back in this forum. I would probably use that one myself but I will probably never use the ones that are down there now such as "next message" but maybe others would use it. BUT I just noticed something else. The FOURM TIP is gone unless I'm blind and don't see it. It was bad enough before that about 75% of the posters didn't see it but now it's not even there. It SHOULD be in BIG bold RED letters right above the subject line. Am I blind here? LOL

- Collapse -
Top of the Page
Apr 21, 2005 4:03PM PDT

I agree. Scrolling down is lousy.
You are replying to this message is lost!
Type size is way too small. And other issues that you have brought up. Poor design! Switcing screens between posting and looking at a full screen of mustard colored blank space before you see your potential post in small typography. What a shame.
All in all?a step backwards for CNET! Shame on you CNET!! :

- Collapse -
Ok, I don't like the font size.
Apr 21, 2005 9:54AM PDT

Too small all of a sudden.

Some of us are old, thank you.

- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) I agree, font too small.
Apr 21, 2005 10:03AM PDT
- Collapse -
(NT) Font size on the tree? The forum door?
Apr 21, 2005 10:23AM PDT
- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) Font size on the tree? Yes, in the tree.
Apr 21, 2005 11:02AM PDT
- Collapse -
There is nothing wrong with the font size
Apr 21, 2005 10:29AM PDT

And it is a good/ font.

- Collapse -
No point repeating but...
Apr 21, 2005 11:02AM PDT

Some of us are over 30!! The eye's are going downhill every year. Larger font size. Cool

- Collapse -
Why not simply use Toni Hackler's tip.
Apr 21, 2005 12:09PM PDT

Hold the CTRL key down and click the + or - or roll the scroll wheel of the mouse one or two clicks and get any size you want????????????????????????????? It then stay at that setting until changed again.

I'm a lot older than you, but I can hold the CTRL key and click the thumbwheel. LOL

- Collapse -
Shouldn't have to Ray. . .
Apr 21, 2005 8:05PM PDT

It was a good size before the change. Now, new colors, link placement I can live with. But I shouldn't have to change my settings because CNet changed theirs. Let them fix it.

- Collapse -
(NT) I agree with that completely Wayne
Apr 21, 2005 10:16PM PDT
- Collapse -
Obviously the font size was not the same for
Apr 22, 2005 6:44AM PDT

everyone. It was fine for me, but had it not been I would have simply changed it. I don't feel that CNET must make mine the correct font size when it is totally adjustable.

I guess the old timers and mods are special. LOL Just kidding.

- Collapse -
Prevents the right-hand crowding on moderate-length threads,
Apr 21, 2005 10:48PM PDT

though, Wayne. It's not ideal, but at least for me it's legible. Wonder what folks with bad eyes say, though...
-- Dave K.

- Collapse -
(NT) dave the font size sucks:)
Apr 21, 2005 11:12PM PDT
- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) I will definitely revisit the font size on the tree--th
Apr 22, 2005 3:32AM PDT
- Collapse -
(NT) as others said fonts way to small
Apr 21, 2005 10:41AM PDT
- Collapse -
Lots of good changes but agree that
Apr 21, 2005 10:52AM PDT

font size is too small. Changing size in IE makes things crawl and in Firefox creates distortions and overlaps. I'm also not sure about the icon legend being at the bottom but I know them anyway. Also I must read all messages in a thread to make it turn grey. Now to get greedyHappy. How about allowing marking individual threads as read instead of all discussions?

- Collapse -
I lied
Apr 21, 2005 10:56AM PDT

Now it seems reading one message in a thread marks it as before.

- Collapse -
One more small item
Apr 21, 2005 11:05AM PDT

Is there any way to move the link to the posters profile a bit farther from message link? If I'm not dead on with the mouse I keep pulling up folks profiles. Not that they're not interesting:), I'd rather see the message first. Anyone else have this problem? How about showing the posters name but not link to the profile from there but from within the message instead?

- Collapse -
I Agree
Apr 21, 2005 11:23AM PDT

Hi Steve: I've done the same many times. I think your suggestion is a very good one, but I don't know if its a possibility.

- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) Definitely revisit this --thanks!
Apr 22, 2005 3:31AM PDT
- Collapse -
FORUM TIP is gone. people didn't pay any
Apr 21, 2005 11:14AM PDT

attention to it anyway but instead of asking only 75% of people for some information for their problem, it will be 99% now. Am I blind or it is gone now?