General discussion

Forever stamps...

Here's an idea my brother came up with... why doesn't the Post Office make ALL stamps "forever stamps"? That way they would not have to update and print new ones every time they raised the rates. Would save a lot of money.

Why not? Seems logical to me.

Discussion is locked

Follow
Reply to: Forever stamps...
PLEASE NOTE: Do not post advertisements, offensive materials, profanity, or personal attacks. Please remember to be considerate of other members. If you are new to the CNET Forums, please read our CNET Forums FAQ. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Reporting: Forever stamps...
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Comments
- Collapse -
There are some reasons for the denominated stamps

The 'forever stamps' are great for standard 1st class postage but what about times when size/weight requires something different?
Also, I'm told that foreign post offices dislike the 'forever stamps' because they want to have the value of the postage explicitly stated due to their varying rules.
I'm sure these problems could be solved if the post office really wanted to but I don't know how big a deal it is.

- Collapse -
They could just have different class designations...

They remain constant while prices fluctuate.

I don't understand why it's an issue for foreign post offices.

I think it would save money.

- Collapse -
I am told that they do this in Britain now...

confirm?

- Collapse -
Confirmed

First Class post stamps and Second Class post stamps. No dates, no amount, just generic First and Second class.

Even if the stamp was purchased years ago, the Post Office guarantees the value of the stamp at today's prices.

It was a staff suggestion some 20 years ago and was taken up because it saved the Post Office literally millions of Pounds over any extended period.

The member of staff who suggested it made a tidy sum out of it as well, as a reward; Happy

Mark

- Collapse -
Good...

I hope they do it here. I am sure my brother will be glad to share the reward with me.

- Collapse -
I would guess

that the reprinting of stamps is the smallest cost at the USPS.
Union slugs #1 cost.

- Collapse -
The cost of laboUr

is a large part of every product...whether Union or not.

Do I detect a note of envy in your post?

CNET Forums

Forum Info