Speakeasy forum

General discussion

For Rob regarding the Futility law in TX

by Evie / April 2, 2005 3:06 AM PST
Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: For Rob regarding the Futility law in TX
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: For Rob regarding the Futility law in TX
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
Evie, many thanks for that superb and even handed article
by Ziks511 / April 3, 2005 10:54 AM PDT

It explained much that I hadn't heard or didn't understand. Many thanks.


Collapse -
You're very welcome Rob
by Evie / April 3, 2005 10:23 PM PDT

It was dumb luck while Googling around on other related topics to hit on something written by someone that both crafted the legislation AND serves on the ethics committees that make such decisions. The study he alluded to will be interesting when it comes out. Also interesting that both NRLC and CID were represented in drafting the legislation. Perhaps now you can see why I get so unnerved when I read stuff in the "mainstream media" that seeks to draw comparisons by ignoring the body of the information available? In reality, his failure to sign a bill unanimously (bipartisanly) passed by the legislature would have been an act of supreme arrogance ... doing so would only have resulted in overriding it. But why wouldn't he sign such a well-considered and well constructed piece of legislation to begin with?

Baby Sun was born terminal. Terri Schiavo was not terminal. Baby Sun died within hours. Even Karen Ann Quinlan lived several years more after her respirator was pulled. Terri took thirteen days of starvation and dehydration. This is why I saw no correlation between the cases. And yes, I still have a lump the size of TX over this in my stomach. I've been doing a lot of research. When I get a chance to collate it I'll compose a post on the more general topic.

Collapse -
I heartily agree with & endorse your view on the shallowness
by Ziks511 / April 4, 2005 10:30 AM PDT

of mainstream media. Since most of my working life has been in hospitals, and with some years at the sharp end too, I find all coverage of medical issues truly dreadful. The only time you will get a half decent story is on PBS Nova or some such program. They don't even do that well on Jim Lehrers NewsHour.

(Why is it I still try to write McNeill-Lehrer when I start to refer to that program? It's still automatic.)

Collapse -
Don't you wish all news stories were written this insightful
by Ziks511 / April 4, 2005 2:26 PM PDT

ly and intelligently, Evie. Regardless of the issue and who was the beneficiary or the loser in the exposition. If I had a sense that the guy criticizing a Democrat would do the same job on a Republican, or vice-versa, and that there would be no editorial interference, I'd be so much happier with journalists, journalism, politicians and the political process in general. I really think this is a major issue for the next couple of decades, tougher and less obviously partisan journalism. The excuse often voiced by journalists is "There's no such thing as objective journalism, personal bias is inherent in the process." Just because personal bias is inherent is no reason to wallow in blatantly partisan or self-indulgent or sloppy work which debases the information disseminating process.

Thanks again for an article I have bookmarked for further study.


Popular Forums
Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
Laptops 21,181 discussions
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
Phones 17,137 discussions
Security 31,287 discussions
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
Windows 10 2,657 discussions

The Samsung RF23M8090SG

One of the best French door fridges we've tested

A good-looking fridge with useful features like an auto-filling water pitcher and a temperature-adjustable "FlexZone" drawer. It was a near-flawless performer in our cooling tests.