... I would have no need to request Dave not act like a patronizing boor if he didn't act that way. Reread my post, that's what I did. If the response violated the TOS then so too did the post that evoked it. I personally don't think there is a need by either party to have it pulled, but apparently there those who do. Like I said before, I see no reason for you and I to continue a discussion about something that doesn't involve you.
If Dave wants to argue the Constitution, fine. But he can do it without resorting to put downs such as "Like many conservatives, you misunderstand the basis of our Constitution." This from someone who claims with a straight face that our Constitution didn't include a right to free and unlimited medical care because back then medical care did more harm than good, but the Founders really did mean that by the general welfare clause although numerous quotations can be cited indicating they were keenly aware that this clause could be bastardized to usurp many of the restrictions on government. It would be nice if he actually addressed the issue for a change and left out the gratuitous political slams at conservatives and now supposedly greedy, stupid, uncaring, racist, homophobic, or whatever we supposedly are. But again, I waste my breath discussing such with a third party.
If you have a problem with me as I relate to you fine. I only mention your namecalling as a pot-kettle thing. So far in this forum none of your posts have insulted me directly so I have no place lining up on sides in your interactions with others. You should do the same. DK is a grown man and can surely speak for himself.

Chowhound
Comic Vine
GameFAQs
GameSpot
Giant Bomb
TechRepublic