Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years.

Thanks,

CNET Support

General discussion

Drive your car, save the planet

Aug 7, 2007 11:42AM PDT

Discussion is locked

- Collapse -
I doubt it is pediatric care ....
Aug 10, 2007 9:18AM PDT

Doctors can do a lot of things but I do not know of any evidence that we have altered the onset of sexual maturity. In most cases if sexual maturity is delayed we can't do anything about it other than find a cause and tell the patient/family what the likely outcome is. (ie: diagnosis/prognosis but not much treatment)

If we DID know how to accelerate sexual maturity I doubt many pediatricians would want to use that knowledge for treatment of normal girls.

- Collapse -
BTW, Doc, the reason I chose to disagree with you
Aug 9, 2007 5:25PM PDT

is partly because of the York studies. The birth and neonate-survival records correlate well with the ups and downs of crop successes.

- Collapse -
re: body composition (fat cells, ...)
Aug 10, 2007 2:53AM PDT

After I read this and some of the other speculation I began to wonder...

It is documented that young girls involved with rigorous athletics (such as gymnastics) will often postpone their menarche for years after their peers have experienced them. The young athlete's bodies put it's energy into muscular development rather than sexual development.

If there is a direct correlation between fat cells and menarche then one wonders if the decreasing age of sexual maturation found in certain countries is caused by a combination of diet and physical inactivity that is increasingly found in the youth of western cultures, (especially the USA)?

grim

- Collapse -
Interesting idea ...
Aug 10, 2007 9:19AM PDT

I have no idea if it is correct, but it is an interesting idea.

- Collapse -
amazing...
Aug 9, 2007 11:48AM PDT

it is a very comprehensive to study the carbon footprint this way...I wonder if/when this will be debunked or if the guy will propose a more closed-loop energy cycle approach...