DISSENTION CANNOT BE TOLERATED

long enough to see that i didnt write that.
but in your typical knee jerk reaction you shot your self again.

please read artical ist ok

and i dont expect you to say your sorry

what a joke!

I'll type real slow for him...the idea was that the lefty ecofreaks...do...not...tolerate...opposing...opinions.

We've seen it here.

and if i changed the title some one would biotch

and the fact that it's wrong, still doesn't disentitle him to his opinion just as it doesn't disentitle you to yours. The country was founded on dissent as EdH should very well know, and it is the source of many of out best institutions.

I think it's the two of you who missed the point.

Rob

current Administration and not some old politician.

kindly point it out to us rob as i totally missed it

Steps in it big time and still tries to blame Bush!!!!!!!

when in doubr use bs when your wrong use bs

Gov't got to do with this

Stay on topic Rob

Don Erickson

I'm impressed rob really i am

what is "typical" of Mark?

Also, why did you feel the need to insinuate that MArk is unaware of his nation's history?

and i bet he wont Even apologize

It is his burden to instruct us.

and substantial, like a University text, you'd know it too. Its not secret knowledge, and its not Liberally Biased as you seem to think, its just different from the pablum you regurgitate, which while not wrong is pre-digested by somebody else. Contrary to popular opinion I don't think i am the possessor of the Da Vinci code, but of the same knowledge available to anyone at the undergraduate level. And unslanted at that.

However far be it from me to disturb your delusions, though my son the incipient University student may disrupt them, if my hopes and wishes are fulfilled. He's a bright lad, and not subservient to his father's ideas, or anyone elses, which could lead to some interesting insights. The fact he writes like an angel doesn't hurt either.

You all seem to mistake anger or irritation for arrogance, I'm not arrogant, and I am more full of questions than answers. It is axiomatic that the more you learn the more sure you are of the holes in your knowledge, and I knew that 30 years before anybody mentioned it here. I have offered evidence, I have offered websites, I have offered books for free. I'm about out of ideas. Fortunately I don't much care what certain members here think because they have already revealed their opinions which I find unpersuasive, and with little back-up.

But thanks all the same for the bad mouthing and the gratuitous insults. They make great fodder for e-mails to friends, a number of whom use Speakeasy as a source for the direction for their lectures so that the same misinformation is not passed along to another generation.

Oh, yeah. And sorry for the longish posts. I was taught to write so people would understand if they chose too, or were marking the work, not merely to snipe.

Rob

Guess what, Rob, a lot of us have numerous books. There's no reason to make a "big hairy deal" of it. I'm waiting with bated breath for one to arrive. A history of coin operated machines by one who should know, Marshall Fey, whose ancestor invented the slot machine. Why did I get it? Just for fun. Books can be a lot of fun, especially what I have refered to as my "dusty old books".

Thank God for this??? So when are you going to quit ramming your ideas down our throats??

"I'm about out of ideas"

Dissent for dissent's sake is meaningless.

If you need a reminder why some here react to you the way you do, bookmark this pompous post of yours for future reference.

Consider also, that many a university tet is also "pre-digested" by someone else. Since this thread is about dissent in science and bias in the global warming debate, I'll use the COUNTLESS examples found in my science texts that refer to global warming as fact. Subtle, to be sure, but if a text countered that it probably wouldn't make it past the editor.

you may fool some of the people sometimes but not fool all the people anytime.
if you bothered to read the article with non biased eyes instead of your bush bashing retoric.
the people that work there cant disagree.


now i could go on like you do and it would be the same as you make no diference

You're the one who began insulting others in this thread... so you have no right at all to whine about others reacting to you in a similar manner.