The dell has DDR2 which means it is dual-channel. Dual channels mean a lot more data throuhput. Plus it runs at a faster MHz speed. Additionally, having two memory channels means that the CPU and the GPU can access the ram easier at the same time. That means the Integrated graphcis of the Dell will perform better than those of the Toshiba. Seems like Toshiba didn't have anything in the pipe for Sonoma and is trying to retro-fit.
As for the hard drive, you will definately see a 20-30% improvement on the hard drive. And if you upgrade the dell to the available 7200-rpm drive, you will be VERY happy.
Or if you can wait a couple of months, Dedicated graphics on the 6000 will be available.
I have narrowed my choices to two new notebooks. My question has to do with the comparitiv performance of the two machines.
They are both the new 1.6 sonoma with integrated graphics. Because of cost, I am okay with the integrated graphics. My question is with the memory and hard drive. The Toshiba still has PC2700 memory while the Dell has DDR2. Will this make much of a difference?
Also, the dell has 5400 drives while the toshiba has the slower 4200. I understand that the seek time is slower on the 4200, but will I notice much of a difference?
Do these performance differences justify paying $250 more for the Dell? The Toshiba is on sale at compusa for $1250 this week and Best Buy will match the price. (compusa also will include a free tivo this week)
Lastly, and probably most importantly, I am struggling with the decision of purchasing an extended warranty from BB. Is this worth the $250 or is it just a big money maker for the store?

Chowhound
Comic Vine
GameFAQs
GameSpot
Giant Bomb
TechRepublic