Speakeasy forum

General discussion

Could this finally provide hope for HIV/AIDS?

by TONI H / May 17, 2009 4:34 AM PDT
Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: Could this finally provide hope for HIV/AIDS?
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: Could this finally provide hope for HIV/AIDS?
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
Looks very promising doesn't it.
by MarkFlax Forum moderator / May 17, 2009 4:44 AM PDT

Hopefully this will be a major step forward.

I'm not sure whether that article is saying this is a possible 'cure' for HIV, or immunization against being infected with it.

"A month after administering the AAV, the nine treated monkeys were injected with SIV, as were six not treated in advance"

It seems they immunized the 9 test monkeys first, then infected them with SIV, the simian form of HIV. So from that at these early stages it looks like immunization only.

Mark

Collapse -
Immunization "only" is
by TONI H / May 17, 2009 5:12 AM PDT

a glass half full to me.....if we can be immunized against polio and wipe it out, this looks more than promising in my opinion for stopping this devastating disease cold. It may not be much help for people already infected, but it's a great beginning for hope on the horizon.

TONI H

Collapse -
(NT) True.
by MarkFlax Forum moderator / May 17, 2009 5:26 AM PDT
In reply to: Immunization "only" is
Collapse -
I imagine it would still be a long time before
by Steven Haninger / May 17, 2009 8:33 AM PDT
In reply to: Immunization "only" is

such a vaccine had proven itself enough to be considered as part of the childhood regimen such as MMR, polio and TB are today. Even these don't always go well. Of course it may sure well be the insurance companies that will influence whether or not there can be wide spread use of such a vaccine....unless government considers picking up the tab in an effort to eradicate rather than manage the disease.

Collapse -
Government already picks up the tab for a lot of vaccines
by Bill Osler / May 17, 2009 9:10 AM PDT

The details vary by state, but in North Carolina most childhood immunizations are already paid for by either state or federal government.

I would hope that it will be MANY years before a new vaccine like this becomes a routine part of the childhood immunization schedule. We need to be EXTREMELY cautious about adopting vaccines based on novel technology. If something went wrong it would just add fuel to all of the existing anti-vaccination junk that is already floating around.

OTOH, if the initial trials look good then making the vaccine available for older patients who request it may take just a few years.

Collapse -
That is interesting ...
by Bill Osler / May 17, 2009 6:05 AM PDT

Assuming that the technique can be safely used it has potential to be very effective as a preventive measure. As someone already observed the vaccine they are currently working with does not offer a cure but the ability to prevent HIV would be HUGE.

I'm a bit concerned about using genetic therapy to prevent infection because that means the vaccine presumably bypasses some of the steps that regulate the immune system. My guess is that creates considerable potential for adverse effects down the road. Still, for high risk patients (and the majority of the people who get HIV do have known high risk) even an imperfect vaccine might be worthwhile. The other situation in which it might be worthwhile if the vaccine works fast enough would be as a post-exposure preventive measure to be used after known accidental exposure.

Of course the vaccine may well work better than I'm predicting, which would be wonderful.

Collapse -
(NT) Great news!
by lylesg / May 17, 2009 10:44 PM PDT
Popular Forums
icon
Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
icon
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
icon
Laptops 21,181 discussions
icon
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
icon
Phones 17,137 discussions
icon
Security 31,287 discussions
icon
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
icon
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
icon
Windows 10 2,657 discussions

GIVEAWAY

Turn up the volume with our Apple Byte sweeps!

Two lucky winners will take home the coveted smart speaker that lets Siri help you around your connected house. This sweepstake ends Feb. 25, 2018.