Speakeasy forum

General discussion

Could there be a new face coming for the Republican Party?

by Ziks511 / February 12, 2006 9:14 PM PST

Heartland Dissident

"With a bluntness that seems habitual ? and more than occasionally strikes fellow Republicans as disloyal ? Senator Chuck Hagel started voicing skepticism about the Bush administration's fixation on Iraq as a place to fight the Global War on Terror more than half a year before the president gave the go-ahead for the assault. What the senator said in public was milder than what he said in private conversations with foreign-policy gurus like Brent Scowcroft, the national security adviser in another Bush administration, or his friend Colin Powell, the secretary of state, who thought he still had a chance to steer the administration on a diplomatic course. The Nebraskan wanted to believe Powell but, deep down, felt the White House wasn't going to be diverted from its drive to topple Saddam Hussein. When he rose on the Senate floor that October to explain his vote in favor of the resolution authorizing force ? he'd persuaded himself that his vote might strengthen Powell's hand ? he gave a speech that would have required no editing had he decided to vote against it. What sounded then to the venture's true believers like the scolding of a Cassandra sounds fairly obvious three and a half years later, which is to say that Hagel's words can reasonably be read as prescient: "How many of us really know and understand Iraq, its country, history, people and role in the Arab world?. . .The American people must be told of the long-term commitment, risk and cost of this undertaking. We should not be seduced by the expectations of dancing in the streets." The president had said "precious little" about post-Saddam Iraq, which could prove costly, Hagel warned, "in both American blood and treasure." "


Usual login semods4@yahoo.com, pw speakeasy.

At least someone in the Party has some sense. And don't confuse blind partisanship with either loyalty or integrity or real Republican values. I have spent much time here pointing out how little the current Republican Party resembles the old Republican Party. These days its about intrusion into or abrogation of the Constitution or pandering to Religious interests which ought to have no place in politics, or good ole boy business lobby backscratching.

I have lots of quarrels with Democrats, not least their equal inclination to corruption as their Republican "opponents" but they're not in power, and Bush is leading this country towards Autocracy and Oligarchy, not towards anything resembling the equality of each person as promised in the Declaration of Independence, and bolstered by the Constiturion and Bill of Rights.

Please note: the Bill of Rights is a bill governing every American, it is not the Bill for the Rights of the Rich, for the Elect, by the True Believers, or any such malarkey as purveyed here.


PS: Mark, to answer your previous taunt, that's how to quote an article.

Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: Could there be a new face coming for the Republican Party?
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: Could there be a new face coming for the Republican Party?
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
(NT) (NT) OK now, take a deep breath!
by Evie / February 12, 2006 9:18 PM PST
Collapse -
Thanks Evie, got me laughing out loud this AM.
by Ziks511 / February 12, 2006 9:57 PM PST

And no I won't be holding that deep, relaxing breath. I'll just compose myself merely in hope, a sort of meditative state.



Collapse -
Whatever relieves the stress ...
by Evie / February 12, 2006 10:00 PM PST

... that causes the need for such outbursts is a good thing! Wink

Collapse -
I know a sure fire stress-elieving technique...
by EdH / February 12, 2006 10:02 PM PST

but I have a feeling Rob already employs it on a regular basis.

Collapse -
The Bill of Rights...
by EdH / February 12, 2006 9:59 PM PST

does NOT govern Americans; it specifically curtails govenmental powers. NO ONE herew has EVER purveyed any such malarkey as you describe. It's a hallucination, nothing more.

Collapse -
im sorry
by Mark5019 / February 12, 2006 10:37 PM PST
Popular Forums
Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
Laptops 21,181 discussions
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
Phones 17,137 discussions
Security 31,287 discussions
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
Windows 10 2,657 discussions

Does BMW or Volvo do it best?

Pint-size luxury and funky style

Shopping for a new car this weekend? See how the BMW X2 stacks up against the Volvo XC40 in our side-by-side comparison.