1. Wouldn't put up with it, would look for one of the hundreds of alternative news sources.
2. Technology sector is always ahead of the curve, and I think places like cnet, engadget etc show you how news would operate without traditional old media newspapers. Websites build reputation on reporting, make enough to get by with advertising. One thing is certain, organizations like NY times have too much corporate bloat for an Internet company, at least at the moment I expect Internet to eventually take over most advertising and there will be more money to go around. For that reason it's also important for old media to get in and stay in early, which they have been so far.
3. No idea. I don't think quality will drop though, talent is talent regardless of who's your boss or the business model.
Consuming/paying for "news", the "new news", etc.
A couple questions on consuming material from traditional print media source like NYTimes, etc. (news, data, analysis, fact, opinion, commentary, rumor, or story):
1) How would approach consuming material if you has a subscription plan of 500 articles/stories per month? How about 100 or 20 per month?
2) If we keep an "unlimited free for all" model - would the quality that supports a sustainable, vibrant, and informed economy drop? How would we know?
3) If quality in daily/weekly news drops - would the publishing industry (large or small publisher) supplant the lack of "vetted, professional" news with books or booklets published monthly/quarterly?
Also, if anyone here has a concise manner in which to describe a business models for print media - please add it to this thread 'cause that would make is a LOT easier to make a first cut at evaluating pros/cons of a particular model someone may think up...
Best,
Shalin

Chowhound
Comic Vine
GameFAQs
GameSpot
Giant Bomb
TechRepublic