14 total posts
So much for everyone who said.....
...that Columbia inviting him to come up there was proof that they were a bunch of leftist, America-hating commie whatevers. They set him up but good! It's just too bad that no Holocaust survivors showed up to give him a few pieces of their minds.
They should have had a moment of silence....
for all of the people held in the Iran Hostage Crisis
Yea...wasn't this guy rumored to have been
identified as possibly being one of the captors?
You mean "students"
Yes, I do believe that there's good evidence that he was one of them.
Had some showed up, Josh...
Josh, had some of them showed up in the audience, how could they have been able "to give him a few pieces of their minds"? All question were pre-submitted and there was a selection process in deciding which ones to use. Signs? No, no one was permitted to bring in signs, they even forbid 2 students from bringing in an American flag.
How do you think that it will play back home in Iran? Think about it. He sponsors terrorists, sends arms and munitions into Iraq to kill Americans, seeks a nuclear weapon, etc., and when confronted with it in a question refuses to answer and smirks.
What does he like to say about us back home? Things like we are weak, will yield when confronted- you know, the "paper tiger" routine. Now he can go back home and say that he went into the lair of the tiger, stuck his head into it's mouth, and smirked. I think that he will play it by saying that we were weak, and his "bravery" by going into the lair of the "Great Satan" and showing that their "best shots" just rolled off his back proves that we are weak and not to be feared but attacked even further.
They could have submitted questions in advance....
.....and been there to witness them being asked.
There's nothing we can do about propaganda. If he had been refused permission to go to Columbia (or anywhere else), he'd have spun that against us too.
They never should have invited him in the first place, but..
...since they did he should have been treated in the same manner any other guest speaker who has accepted your invitation to speak would be shown. We don't show how we are more civilized through acting like barbarians without the simplest of common manners toward a guest. Do you invite someone to your house and then treat them shamefully? I'd hope not. Instead you choose NOT to invite someone you can't feel civil toward, and invite those you can. If you invite an enemy, then show him how much better you are by treating him in a civil manner and not make an *** of yourself.
It gives Ahmadinejad an excellent opportunity to claim the Americans were rude hosts and have it in for Iran.
Ahmadinejad opened his remarks by saying Bollinger's introduction was discourteous, intellectually dishonest and inaccurate.
Not really much of a victory is it?
pyrrhic is a great word
The student reaction was rather tame
I heard at one point he was applauded and cheered...
his only mistake was in impugning gays. You can trash America, but you dast not say anything against the gays.
I am sure Ahmadinejad was very happy with this performance. Bollinger made it better by acting the bully, exactly what Ahmadinejad wants. It was a blunder to invite him and then to insult him an even bigger blunder.
I've seen Ahmadinejad on Charlie Rose and he's also been interviewed by Christiane Amanpour, among others. This trip is a big propaganda coup for him. You have to bear in mind just who the intended audience is...
One thing I noticed...
One thing I noticed was Bollinger's question about what would he have said if he had gone to "Ground Zero". He was prevented from going there and presenting his propaganda speech. So what does Bollinger do? Tell him to give that speech right then in front of all of the assembled media. Talk about giving him a perfect setup, it played right into his hands.
I don't disagree with what he said, but I disagree with when he said it under the conditions. If you invite a guest speaker to a function, as a host you don't get up and then speak disparagingly of him before the guest speaks. I see that as the worst sort of rudeness. If you feel you must express your opinion of the guest, then first you serve as host to your guest until he's departed. Later you can then express any opinions or dismay over what he may have said. Very rude and a blemish upon him.