22 total posts
methinks you delve to deep
I brought this up in the Feedback forum
It's a term with partisan political origins, and I think CNET should change the page.
I looked it up...
Instead of an "urban" dictionary, I looked it up in a well-recognized reference book. It was "Dictionary of American Slang" by Robert L. Chapman, Ph.D,
It said :
bork or Borked, late 1980's 1 v To mount an intense campaign against a political appointee : =BUSH/WACK:"We're going to Bork him, " proclaimed a feminist advocate--New Republic
2 n: ...close ranks to coordinate a huge preemptive bork --New Republic
[fr the experience of Judge Robert Bork, whose 1987 nomination to the Supreme Court was rejectedby a strong concerted opposition}
I found it
& added my objection to the term usage to yours.
When I think about that
Depending on the context, I can see that it could be used as an offensive weapon by either party. The broken link message during that time appeared to be an attempt at light humor and was, IMO, rather silly. But I don't see a reason why anyone out there should start jumping up and down and risk having a heart attack over it.
that CNET has employed writer who lacks certain skills. Or may be it is just the modern way.
Have a look at the How To page and scroll down to where people can "Ask a Question".
The message box says, "Now add some detail so that smart CNET users (like you!) can answer...."
I think the (like you!) may have been added as an afterthought. Otherwise it would have meant 'some smart CNET user, (which you are not, obviously)!'
Whatever happened to the old values? Borked link indeed!!
I saw that
and figured it was Lee, since it was so much like his answer of the week he was doing, and having read enough of his posts over the years I automatically interpreted as I knew he'd have used it, as being upbeat and encouraging, therefore sort of missed how others who might not realize that could take it.
Here's another oddity from the Buzz Out Lounge
Is the repetition for effect, or just an oversight?
Buzz Out Loud Lounge forum
Create a New Discussion
Get Started Here
Buzz Out Loud Lounge is where you chat with fellow fans of the popular of the popular Buzz Out Loud podcast. Discussions center on the latest hot technology issues, featured commentary, special guests, and witty banter.
I've reported you.
Lee, James has found an error in BOL's forum description. Should that get fixed or shall I kill James?
wow, just a few days ago, you were applauding the lack...
... you were applauding the lack of trolling comments... and now here you are searching out reasons to link a political foot note in history to commonly used computer slang. Consider the fact that this site is mostly devoted to computers and computer technology rather than politics. Now consider that your complaint ignores this fact AND smacks of conservative politically correctness (something that you have openly derided on many occasions).
Come on man, are you really so bored that you have to go searching for stuff to create a political tempest in a tea cup here on CNET ?
LOL, you are a hoot sometimes!
Based on your statement
I didn't say I was personally offended by the term. I don't use it.
"you are searching out reasons to link a political foot note in history to commonly used computer slang"
OK, separate from any political foot note, where would you say this "computer slang" originated? I don't think the description of "computer slang" really applies.
I first consulted several dictionaries to ascertain the etymology of the term used, in case my initial suspicion was incorrect. I discovered however I was correct in suspecting it traced back to one good man and the unfair travail he endured. Such casual use of a term derived from his name, considering what Robert Bork endured, seems inappropriate for a business site.
I think usage of the term "borked" fails to meet the image CNET might prefer to present.
Most likely a 20 something doing the coding and has no idea what "Borked" means.
If all links have to be passed by censors now,
would somebody please look at mine in the "Ask dark matter question" thread and get a move on! If that's not the problem, I have a question.
and about four more. I'm not doing this for my health. I think some things are interesting.
Since you don't provide links to those posts here I'm not going searching!
But just to let you know, links in forum posts have always been vetted against the guidance laid down in Forum Policy, and that continues to this day.
So unless a link clearly contravenes that policy it remains.
And also just so you know, I'm not doing this for my health either.
Was a time we trusted each other.
I do believe I've been around here longer than you. (Call For Help - ZNet)
My missing posts may still magically appear. ? Hope and no bounds. You know? There's no politics in any of them.
We never trusted each other.
In fact, when I became a moderator, there was one paid moderator.
Then why, crowsfoot...
O.K., you're not here for your health. Then why are you here? I've been around the Forums since the ZD days and my reason is that I find it fun. That's the only reason that I've ever needed.