General discussion

Carter Page vs Dems

May 31, 2017 10:14AM PDT

They have been demanding he testify under oath at their Congressional Hearing.....he offered a proffer laying out what he would have to say showing Comey and Brenner lied to them....now they are a pulling a "Gilda Radner" line straight out of Saturday Night Live.........."NEVER MIND".

He just made fools out of all of them, and I'm really hoping that the Republicans in charge of that committee bring him in anyhow. You CANNOT have a FAIR hearing if you refuse to hear BOTH sides of a story.

http://www.thelibertyeagle.com/judge-napolitano-carter-page-testimony-doesnt-fit-dems-narrative/

Discussion is locked

Follow
Reply to: Carter Page vs Dems
PLEASE NOTE: Do not post advertisements, offensive materials, profanity, or personal attacks. Please remember to be considerate of other members. If you are new to the CNET Forums, please read our CNET Forums FAQ. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Reporting: Carter Page vs Dems
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Comments
- Collapse -
The Dems postponed it INDEFINITELY.....
May 31, 2017 12:14PM PDT

which means they are REFUSING to hear what he has to say.....how can you 'investigate' something you are accusing him of doing and NOT want to hear HIS side of it?

THAT is the REAL question you should be asking, JP.

According to Comey and Brennan, Page was 'colluding' with Russia....obviously he has more than 'nothing of importance to say', JP, or he wouldn't have VOLUNTEERED to testify and is now DEMANDING that he be allowed to do so.

IF you take a look at the date of the meeting Page had with the Russians, it was in DECEMBER....AFTER the election....and perfectly legal to have that meeting. HOWEVER, it blows apart the accusation that he 'colluded' with them to get Trump elected. But that December meeting also coincides with BO's directive to begin an investigation into Russia's interference in the election and Trump's campaign. You can't have it both ways, JP.....

- Collapse -
I've seen/heard Carter Page a few times
May 31, 2017 12:29PM PDT

it seemed to me that he was someone that was just looking for attention...(his 15 minutes of fame)

in DECEMBER....AFTER the election....and perfectly legal to have that meeting. HOWEVER, it blows apart the accusation that he 'colluded' with them to get Trump elected.

And that "proves" he didn't have meetings BEFORE December...because there is a record of meetings AFTER the election?

Not in MY books.


The Dems postponed it INDEFINITELY.

Page says NOT IMMEDIATELY....YOU say INDEFINITELY

Get YOUR facts straight.

- Collapse -
Indefinitely....
May 31, 2017 2:42PM PDT
- Collapse -
OK
May 31, 2017 7:55PM PDT

You AND FOX need to get the facts straight

Page says might NOT be IMMEDIATELY afforded....YOU say INDEFINITELY Even in YOUR link to the video....at the 25 second mark...READ what is on the screen

post·pone

cause or arrange for (something) to take place at a time later than that first scheduled.

CNET Forums

Forum Info