General discussion

Carter did it, Clinton did it..........

Discussion is locked

Follow
Reply to: Carter did it, Clinton did it..........
PLEASE NOTE: Do not post advertisements, offensive materials, profanity, or personal attacks. Please remember to be considerate of other members. If you are new to the CNET Forums, please read our CNET Forums FAQ. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Reporting: Carter did it, Clinton did it..........
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Comments
- Collapse -
Horrors!

Can we impeach them both retroactively?

- Collapse -
I'd get an F from my Poli Sci prof

for handing in such a "scholarly" piece of work... Bush's Press Sec explained today that last year when Bush stated that no wiretaps would be done without a court order (said this on camera no less) he was refering to taps done under the auspices of the Patriot Act and the NSA taps are completely different which makes it OK.

Since good old Scott put that in perspective for us, do you think you or Mr Drudge could be a little more specific on how these presidents did their dirty little deeds ?

grim

- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) It is hitting the news. It's true.
- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) So did Nixon. And your point is?
- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) its allowed under the wars act
- Collapse -
There's nothing new about it the activities under President

Bush. It's an established procedure which has been used for a long time.

- Collapse -
I'm unclear. That citizenship test that we were all

encouraged to try had a question on who has the right to declare war. The correct answer was the Congress, not the President. When did Congress declare war on Afghanistan, or Iraq, both of which conflicts we have won by the way, and against which nation or national leader are we fighting this war? Osama bin Laden is not a leader of anything but an ad hoc bunch of terrorists. Same for Al Zarqawi.

There is no war. There has not even been a declaration of war on terrorism by Congress. There are no war powers for the President and all of this behavior is illegal however predictable given Bush's absence of character or common sense. Now as it happens I have no problem with the NSA examining international communications without a specific warrant. I thought that was essentially its mandate. But Bush arrogating to himself the powers of a wartime president (debatable during the Viet Nam War where there was a nation we were fighting with its very own leader too, but far more justified because it was at least closer to being a war) is delusionary behavior.

The established procedures you talk about are derived specifically from a declaration of war by the US Congress. Soon as you get one, Bush's subsequent actions will be legal but not the ones he's been engaging in for the last 4 years, they're impeachable offences if the Congress had any spine or self respect.

Rob

- Collapse -
According to NPR yesterday

the Secret Court that is in place to review all wiretaps of this sort and the present laws that cover the issue were put in place 27 years ago.

The wire taps Per Se... are not illegal to perform immediately as the need arises as long as it is reviewed with the secret court in a timely manner.

Other interesting points that were raised in the story was the fact that the administration tried to amend the war powers act days after it was passed to cover such issues and that further reviews of how to approach congress re: this matter have been done as recently as USAG gonzalez attaining his post. This raises the question that if Bush (et al) really believed he was within his legal rights to do these taps then why has further legislative proposals been under consideration as recently as this past year?

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5068151

grim

CNET Forums

Forum Info