I'm curious too, about the DC100. Although I'm more in the market for the Sony DCR-DVD505, the cheaper Canon may be adequate. The only review CNet has done (as far as I can find) is the brief once-over at the show earlier this year. It won't be the first time we've had to wait on editor reviews - it took a while to find much on the Sony. In fact I found reviews elsewhere than CNet that were helpful. I understand that a whole bunch of devices divided by a few reviewers with limited time means it takes a while to publish each analysis. More often than not you'll get user reviews up the ying yang before an editorial appears about a device; and user reviews can differ substantially from the eventual editor's review.
But if Consumer Reports can publish an annual automobile issue, why can't tech appraisers do the same for popular products like cameras? Then again, perhaps I shouldn't be looking gift horses in the mouth, and be happy with the info CNet does provide, even if it isn't always timely to my needs.
I'm new to CNET forums (or any for that matter), so forgive me, in advance, if this topic has been covered. I'm in the market for a DVD camcorder and my budget is approximately $500. I've been looking at the reviews on CNET for the Canon DC10 and Canon DC20. I also am interested in the Canon DC100 that hasn't been released yet. I'm concerned about the quality of light indoors that is continually referred to with the Canon products and I hope someone out there has some information to share with me about this, specifically as it relates to these products, or if there is a different brand I should be focusing on. What attracts me to the Canons I've mentioned are the size, weight, placement of battery, and a few other features. Thanks for your thoughts.

Chowhound
Comic Vine
GameFAQs
GameSpot
Giant Bomb
TechRepublic