## Mac Applications forum

General discussion

# Calibration graphs on Numbers

I am new to Numbers and need help to understand the difference I found today between an equation generated in Excel and the one generated in Numbers. I was making a graph to show potentials against the log of an ion concentration. Excel gave it to me right away in the lab, but at home I got an entirely different answer in Numbers.

Any ideas? I would love to stick with one spreadsheet program, preferably mastering iWork.

Thanks.

Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: Calibration graphs on Numbers
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: Calibration graphs on Numbers
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
WIthout seeing the equation.

In reply to: Calibration graphs on Numbers

It would be hard to guess why the result changed.

Collapse -
Calibration graphs on Numbers

In reply to: WIthout seeing the equation.

Hi R. I had two short columns of values x axis is the log of solution concentration, and y axis is the potentials from the ion selective electrodes (I was measuring fluoride content).
0.70 0.190
1.00 0.175
1.40 0.153
1.70 0.137

When I put this values in the graph for Excel, I got the equation : Y= -0.0533x + 0.2277
When I came home and put the same values into Numbers, I got - well I just rechecked and got the same value. I must have chosen the wrong type of chart. New days bring new solutions.

Anyway R, if you have words of encouragement as to why I should use Numbers over Excel, I am open to hear what you have to say.

Thanks for responding.
Jonelle

Collapse -
Just one and then it's not a great one.

In reply to: Calibration graphs on Numbers

Because Microsoft Excel uses the same files and code under the hood.

Then again you could try Open Office which mimics Excel in other ways and is free.
Bob

## Popular Forums

icon
Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
icon
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
icon
Laptops 21,181 discussions
icon
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
icon
Phones 17,137 discussions
icon
Security 31,287 discussions
icon
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
icon
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
icon
Windows 10 2,657 discussions

## GIVEAWAY

Enter to win* a free holiday tech gift!

CNET's giving five lucky winners the gift of their choice valued up to \$250!