12 total posts
You mean the swamp hasn't been drained yet?
Republicans have their work cut out for them next year.
If the Republicans got out of the swamp
and they each took one person from the other side with them...
The swamp would be clean.
And ready for some new inhabitants after the next election.
Not so. They would have to take ...
at least 1.5 people from "the other side" and even then it would be murky.
(and that is AFTER it already got "new inhabitants")
Not sure I agree with any law against this
Isn't this a PAC that is under his direct control? Wouldn't that make it same as campaign funds? Since such funds are intended to help a person gain office, then why should such funds not also be used for any legal defense which would defend him on matters which could impact his remaining in such office? Under such an understanding they are still serving the purpose of not just helping him gain such office, but to defend his ability to remain in such office.
A PAC is considered a seperate entity...
and is not allowed to give him gifts. Their legal purpose is to be political activists, only. Ostensibly they are "independent."
I realize the law, but
...saying such shouldn't be considered a "gift" since it's still a form of support for him not just attaining office, but enabling a defense in order to remain in office. That's a lot different than use the funds to build a new wing onto his house, or provide a nice vacation somewhere.
It might seem a lot different, but...
it's a thing of value that he is being given which is not connected to him being elected. Without it he would have to spend his own money and not be able to build a new wing. In the eyes of the law it IS the same thing.
Definitely NOT political action.
Otherwise a PAC would just be a slush fund
But not of the gift violation, amazingly.
The full ethics committee -- known as the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct -- will now recommend a punishment for Rangel to the House of Representatives. The penalty can can range from a fine to expulsion. Most observers believe Rangel is likely to be reprimanded but not expelled.
That's s shame. They should kick him out, ASAP.
That's a shamne. He shoud be kicjed out
The shame is that for 2 1/2 years
The democrat leadership did little to remove him and the democrat base did NOTHING to remove him.
I suspect a wrist slap will be in order, but he will make another fine Democrat albatross.
We can certainly agree
this is one character in my opinion should have been gone long before now for his shenanigans.