It was only the Canadian border. Who worries about that direction anyway? Hey, it's not like we are in a war on terrorism or anything.![]()
![]() | Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years. Thanks, CNET Support |
Discussion is locked
It was only the Canadian border. Who worries about that direction anyway? Hey, it's not like we are in a war on terrorism or anything.![]()
anyone saying it wasn't important. I remember people saying there was something of MORE importantance than a single episode of a rich white guy sneaking in.
But let's not worry about the Mexican border. No problems there, nossir! We can safely ignore that!
By the way, how many thousands of people has Speaker infected so far? What's the death toll? Oh, NONE? Oh.
So, then why does the CDC still consider him a danger? Oh, they DON'T? Oh.
Can you PROVE that anyone who has illegally crossed the southern border has infected anyone??
The person that makes the claim is in no way obligated to provide any proof. Or does that rule only go one way??????
Whether or not the guy was contagious, his passport was flagged. That he crossed the border with a flagged passport is a concern...
I merely agreed that it was as important as some people thought, regardless of what "some people" was intended to mean.
Some police, for example, might put out a description: a white man, red hair, freckles medium build, about six feet tall, grungy blue jeans, and a torn t-shirt, driving a late model tricycle.
That would be normal, more or less.
But if the description said the man was of Arabic decent, that is a forbidden! ::sarcastic expression on face::