.
.
![]() | Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years. Thanks, CNET Support |
.
Discussion is locked
sang. Josh Groban sang, but I had to go outside and missed him.
Hi, JR.
>>Josh Groban sang, but I had to go outside and missed him.<<
Too bad, his "You raise me up" tribute to the astronauts was both excellent and touching.
-- Dave K, Speakeasy Moderator
click here to email semods4@yahoo.com
The opinions expressed above are my own,
and do not necessarily reflect those of CNET!
.
I haven't even opened those threads which discuss it (until this one), let alone read or written to them. Mention the name of any member of the Jackson family, my stomach turns and I have to reach for the sick bowl.
I told JR the Superbowl was no big deal here (they tried introducing American Football as a mainstream sport here in the 1980's - it failed dismally), and from what you guys have been putting in your topic headers, I clearly missed nothing worth seeing, least of all some cheap slapper who doesn't know how to keep her scaffolding intact.
Hi, Dale.
>>I clearly missed nothing worth seeing<<
Actually, the pre-game entertainment was excellent (see above), and the game itself was one of the most exciting Super Bowls in many years.
-- Dave K, Speakeasy Moderator
click here to email semods4@yahoo.com
The opinions expressed above are my own,
and do not necessarily reflect those of CNET!
She's a millionaire.
and laughing at every post as she makes her way to the bank.
Ian
161 and, er, counting...
Regards
Mo
Well, it was so fast on TV that I blinked and missed it but wife saw. The photo to me seems like it was too round and fully packed with something. "Big deal"...well I like to view 'real' *****, even in push-up bras, although ***** has nothing to do with how good a gal is sexually. ![]()
.
Your insinuation that the uproar is because of age is barely misses being age discrimination and derogatory. The little disclaimer that there is nothing wrong with getting older doesn't cover your insult.
Granted, the values are generally different at 20 and 50. But few peoples values stay the same all their live, views of what is appropriate for the situation may change.
"...there is nothing wrong with getting older, but sometimes the older generations have less understanding for these issues."
WRONG
Most may have a different view of things than you, that does not mean they understand the issue less. You're implying that because their view is not what you or others would consider modern (or perhaps progressive) they don't understand.
Let me know how you feel about that in 20 years, ok?
A large, very large, number of Americans have made a disgusting comment: a woman's breast is a damaging thing for a child to see.
For lucky children, its the first thing other than mommy's face they learn to recognise!!!!!!!!!!
Deliberately misinterpreting anything Charlie says to make yourself a hero was started by Edward way way back before he got addicted to the fish adverisement.
Get real. There are people in the world who do not consider what happened to be bad, and we are not all perverts.
Ian
you are deliberately twisting things here!
nobody but nobody said this #a woman's breast is a damaging thing for a child to see#.... you might want to check again ian *or buy a ladder, cos that hole is gettin awfuh deep massah*
who are still blind to their sin. The rest of the world are also sinners, but they know it.
Hi, KP.
Once again, the assumption that your values are right and everyone else's are wrong if they don't agree with yours. Many of those you label sinners are Christian, too -- but have a different view from you as to the relative importance of different aspects of His message.
-- Dave K.
Speakeasy Moderator
click here to email semods4@yahoo.com
The opinions expressed above are my own,
and do not necessarily reflect those of CNET!
you are a pot calling a kettle black Dave.
but it's the Bible's judgement not mine. Also, I'm saying that a normal situation is being described rather than a perverted one. Do you prefer the the word 'perverted' in describing the behaviour?
Jesus approves of trashy lyrics (I'll have your body naked by the end of this song), seductive dancing, and a simulated sexual assault. Those who think such things are 'not bad' (I think that's what Ian said) are indeed sinners blind to their sin. They may not think so, but that doesn't alter the truth of the statement.
What do the 'other' Christians, you refer to, think of sin? Do they think it's real? Do they think it's the common human condition? Do they think they are without sin?
Hi, KP.
I've said I didn't think much of that halfime display. Not sure that I'd call it sinful or evil -- just vulgar and tasteless. But the issue we're into now is whether the nude body and sexuality itself are ipso facto evil. Have you ever seen Hair? I'm sure you know that there's a nude scene -- everyone does. But it's not sexual, lewd, or lascivious. The cast simply stands on the stage, drops their robes, while singing
"What a piece of work is man, how noble in reason..."
Unfortunately, there's a long Christian history, dating back to the accomodations made with the Albigensian Heresy back at the time of the Black Death. The Albigensians believed that the world and the flesh were in themselves evil, and even denied the divinity of Christ. It was at that time that the Catholic Church (which was still all of Western Christendom) began to teach that sex is evil, and only justified for the purpose of procreation. BTW, the Eastern (Orthodox) Churches missed that influence, and do not have the same emphasis on morality as primarily involving sexuality.
-- Dave K, Speakeasy Moderator
click here to email semods4@yahoo.com
The opinions expressed above are my own,
and do not necessarily reflect those of CNET!