Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years.

Thanks,

CNET Support

General discussion

Bible question. Where to research?

Mar 25, 2005 4:06AM PST

Hi,

I'm hoping that some who have gotten further than I in Bible study can answer or point me in the right direction.

I was recently told that when Jesus said on the cross "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do" (Luke 23:34) that the word 'forgive' in the original text was not the typical form of forgive, but one that means to leave alone, or do not interfere, let them come.

This would change Jesus' plea (to me, anyway) from one of asking the Father to have mercy on those who killed him to asking the Father to hold back at that moment from inflicting His wrath on them, to allow them to carry out the crucifixion in order to let God's plan be fully realized.

--Cindi
Speakeasy Moderator
click here to email the mods

Discussion is locked

- Collapse -
You think then that sex is a sin? God the Son was there. He
Apr 12, 2005 11:58AM PDT

had just created the universe including Adam and Eve (see John 1 where He is called the Word). The plan didn't call for Jesus to be present until much later in time. I think the phrase 'the fullness of time' is frequently used. It means the time is right.

- Collapse -
not sex, just the 'apple' part
Apr 13, 2005 4:16AM PDT

And if he hadnt eaten from the tree of knowledge, then he wouldnt know all about sex, and as a result we wouldnt be here now. Thank goodness Adam and Eve were disobedient! Happy

- Collapse -
What makes you think he didn't know about sex before that?
Apr 13, 2005 1:21PM PDT

He just wasn't self conscious about it or his body. Before we thank ....... for sin, we should consider sin's effects. War, disease, the plunder of the earth, murder, death, pain, suffering, lust, greed, sloth, etc. I think I'll skip being 'thankful' for that stuff.

- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) Then what was the tree of knowledge about?
Apr 15, 2005 11:13AM PDT
- Collapse -
"The power of Adam's deciding for himself what is good
Apr 15, 2005 4:28PM PDT

and what is evil and of acting accordingly, a claim to complete moral independence." That's what a footnote in the RC Jerusalem Bible says, and it goes on: "The first sin was an attack on God?s sovereignty.?
That is, it was an attack on God?s right to be man?s absolute ruler or superior. 'That fruit isn't for you.' 'Yes, it is.'
This independence from superior moral authority is man's problem down to this day- read your newspaper!

Out of love alone Adam could have kept his integrity to Jehovah- Jesus proved that- and at the end of whatever testing period Jehovah had purposed he would have been given the privilege of everlasting life. Perhaps by being given the fruit of the other tree; who knows? Jehovah's concern, not mine.

We live in a terrible age, which (evolutionists say) should be better than any age before. We have not just the "blind watchmaker"- natural selection- but our own conscious powers and abilities to improve. The result? Read your newspaper!
Regards, Doug in New Mexico

- Collapse -
The temptation was to be like God. IOW, to be God.
Apr 16, 2005 12:57AM PDT

That is a common thing in many of the world's groups. It is not necessarily a religious thing, although it is common in religion. It is also creeping into the scientific establishment as we increasingly decide who's human and who's not among other things.

- Collapse -
Another question on intelligence
Apr 16, 2005 7:07AM PDT
- Collapse -
You misunderstand
Apr 17, 2005 11:53PM PDT

evolutionists, to say the least.

Dan

- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) No, I hold them to their teachings.
Apr 18, 2005 3:49AM PDT
- Collapse -
In that case
Apr 18, 2005 5:32AM PDT

you missapply those teachings to areas for which they were never intended.

Dan

- Collapse -
The text says it was the tree of the knowledge of good and
Apr 15, 2005 4:49PM PDT

evil. We do not know exactly what that means, but it does not mean sex. Other writers and Jesus make that clear.

The immediate result of partaking was that Adam and Eve 'fell', and gained a knowledge of sin. Sin is disobeying God, and involves things like murder, stealing, etc. There were other effects of the 'fall' that impacted the entire creation. CS Lewis speculates that Adam and Eve had far greater abilities than we could dream of today. He suggests that they literally 'fell' out of this higher level of existence and consciousness.

Another way of saying this is that their original nature died as God said it would. Mercifully, physical death was deferred for a period of time. Paul speaks of us as being spiritually dead totally unable to help ourselves unless God intervenes to give us new life.

- Collapse -
but it does not mean sex.
Apr 15, 2005 6:28PM PDT

some would disagree with you...

i'm not too sure of the wording, but it's to do with "thou shalt not know another mans woman" the emphasis is always on 'another woman' and, if i recall correctly, a woman cannot 'know' a man,,,, see why they always blame Adam?

,

- Collapse -
The species
Apr 12, 2005 7:33AM PDT

of tree is about as consequential as whether Gilgamesh was left handed or right handed.

Dan

- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) Im sure the flood got it in any case ;)
Apr 12, 2005 7:44AM PDT
- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) Left. Like Bart. :-)
Apr 12, 2005 7:55AM PDT
- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) Ambidextrous, actually. ;-)
Apr 13, 2005 2:27AM PDT
- Collapse -
Of course He knew
Apr 11, 2005 11:44AM PDT

When you have children, you know that they will disagree with you and do things you disapprove of but do you smother your children at birth to stop this from happening? No, you don't. You do the best you can and hope they turn around someday. Then again, they may not.

click here to email semods4@yahoo.com

- Collapse -
You know they will fail, and you think about ways to rescue
Apr 11, 2005 12:03PM PDT

them. God has His rescue plan in place before He ever created anything. He would come in the person of Jesus Christ and rescue those who would grasp the rescuing hand.

- Collapse -
Actually, Diana, don't [u]we[/u] just hope for the best? :-)
Apr 12, 2005 5:20AM PDT

Many people think Murphy's Law came out of computing; it didn't: It's from parenting. Don't ask me how I know. Happy

IMO if Jehovah is worthy of the unconditional worship we're asked to give him (Rev 4:11) then he should do better than we can manage. The bible assures me he did:
'And God saw that [these creations] were good,' until Adam was made: ?. . .After that God saw everything he had made and, look! [it was] very good. And there came to be evening and there came to be morning, a sixth day.? (Ge 1:31)

In fact, for "very good" we might even substitute "perfect," in its other sense of "complete:" Jehovah and Adam in their respective domains; Ps 115:16.

I think Adam had real choices and the goods needed to make the right ones. He failed; Jesus succeeded. (1 Cor 15)
Now we have our choices.
Regards, Doug in New Mexico

- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) Hope for the best - plan for the worst - sound familar?
Apr 12, 2005 9:46AM PDT
- Collapse -
Forgive
Apr 11, 2005 11:55AM PDT

Hi Cindy!
I was very intrugued by your post. If that person is correct it doesnt seem to make any difference to me. Both meanings could be valid.
I'm thinking of the time when Jesus rebuked his disciples in the garden because they attempted to save the Lord from being captured.
Another thought is when Jesus pleaded with the Father to take the cup of suffering from him.

- Collapse -
Cindi, please read...
Apr 13, 2005 9:09AM PDT

I've carefully crafted this post in hopes that you may intercede on behalf of not only yourself, but those I believe you believe in.

My wife is privy to your creations of animation which are specific to her as they relate to her relationship with me.

I wish to thank you once again for your great-hearted reach out to those who do not have your talent.

On a more serious note, I'd like to inquire as to the availability of reinstatement in good standing in this CNET forum where it is clear to me that one has to have a champion with the big boys on top.

Thank you Cindi for considering my request and I once again thank you for your IMPARTIAL consideration of my request.

- Collapse -
Read, and answered.
Apr 14, 2005 4:48AM PDT

Hi jmuzer,

That might be difficult without knowing exactly whom it is that is requesting reinstatement. Those who have been banned while I've been a Moderator have been banned for good cause, and I've no reason to believe that wasn't the practice previous to my appointment as a Moderator.

In any case, the decision would have to be a joint one between ALL the Moderators here, and TPTB as well. If you will send an email to the Mod's address and tell us who you are, and why you'd like reinstatement, I can promise you that we'll seriously consider your request.

Regards,
--Cindi
Speakeasy Moderator
click here to email the mods