Best $200 Camera with video for low light and fast action?


I'm looking to purchase a camera with video capability for around $200. I'll be using it to document an upcoming tour for my band.

We play a lot of house shows and small spaces. Our shows consist of a lot of movement.

Can any help me out?


Discussion is locked
Reply to: Best $200 Camera with video for low light and fast action?
PLEASE NOTE: Do not post advertisements, offensive materials, profanity, or personal attacks. Please remember to be considerate of other members. If you are new to the CNET Forums, please read our CNET Forums FAQ. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Reporting: Best $200 Camera with video for low light and fast action?
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
- Collapse -
You are asking for a lot
- Collapse -
I totally know it's asking for a lot.

Thanks for the tip. I really appreciate it! I'm checking that camera out now.

- Collapse -
TODAY. How about an entry level dslr?

I see it over at woot com today. For those just starting out, not 15K?

- Collapse -
Stills no, video yes

You will not be able to buy a camera for $200 that will take good action photos in low light, unless you can get close and use the flash. Video on the other hand is not nearly as demanding as still photos. A $200 camera will take pretty good HD video in low light. The audio though varies widely, from bad to acceptable.

- Collapse -
Video Yes?

Do you have any recommendation for good video and acceptable audio?

- Collapse -

To make a good $200 camera, it is necessary to cut as many costs as possible.
A digital camera's purpose is to take good "still" pictures. The ability to take video is a bonus because that can be done cheaply (mostly firmware). So, you will not get excellent audio; you get the least expensive audio circuits that is competative with the competition.

And that is basic AGC (automatic gain control).
Which will boost the sound if the sound is too low.
It will not lower the sound if it is too high.
If you try to record live music you will get distortion if you are too close to the music source.
There is no adjustment for loudness.

Camcorders are more likely to have good audio circuits than digital cameras.
Recently a couple of digital cameras were released that boast of their audio abilities but the cheapest one is over $2500.

The bottom line is that there is no low cost digital camera that has good sound or microphones good enough for live music recording.


- Collapse -
Not true

A AGC will indeed attempt to attenuate a high signal. But it can't work miracles. If the signal is strong enough, distortion will occur. The other side of the coin is that depending on the design, an AGC can attenuate a signal too might avoid clipping distortion, but end up reducing the dynamic range so much that the sound is very "flat" sounding.

So...I'm sure you can find a $200 camera that will record music with acceptable (read: not great, but good enough) audio. But don't take my word for it. Go to YouTube and watch and listen to some examples. With that, my Sony HX9V, which I purchased factory refurbished for $240:

- Collapse -
Checkout this Camera

Nikon Coolpix L310:

Nikon Coolpix L310 has a 21x optical zoom, a high resolution 3 inch LCD screen, HD (720p) movie recording capabilities and a 14 megapixel CCD sensor. The optical zoom with an autofocus function can be used during video recording and the camera's high ISO range (up to 6400) means it's great for shooting in low light situations.

click here if u want reviews about this product:

thank you

CNET Forums