No it does not mean Bush was right at all, so don't look for what isn't there. This inquiry has absolutely nothing to do with Bush or the actions of the United States, it is an entirely British matter concerned entirely with the conduct of the BRITISH government and our leading independent broadcaster. This time your conceited country is NOT centre stage, indeed it does not even have a bit part in the production, so get over it.
Hutton was a political choice. He is intransigent, and incapble of seeing anything in shades of grey which is the way the real world exists. He also dismissed a great deal of evidence as "irrelevant" when it was in fact germaine to the investigation and the sequence of events that occured. Hutton is a supporter of the government and that is the reason Blair chose him to head up the inquiry. There are any number of other equally competent Law Lords could have run the inquiry and the report would have been quite different vis a vis the government's culpability.
As for your scoffing at what was said, that only serves to show your limited ability to understand the implications. If the news media cannot publish anything until it has gathered incontrovertible proof from sources other than the respected experts, then effectively nothing at all can ever be published. This is tantamount to gagging the press, which is something Blair has been aching to do ever since he got elected, while his own party spin machine feeds misinformation with impunity.
I now fully expect your own president to follow Blair's lead as he too has the same ambition of silencing lawful protest and peaceful criticism of elected government. Let's see how loud you scoff then when it happens in your own country, because trust me, that is what is going to happen.
'LONDON - BBC reporter Andrew Gilligan resigned Friday after a judicial inquiry repudiated his reporting that the government "sexed up" intelligence on Iraq'
'Besides Gilligan, the BBC's two top officials ? BBC chairman Gavyn Davies and director general Greg **** ? also have resigned; the BBC apologized to the government after the inquiry.'
They didn't exactly admit their guilt however, they continued to say they were mostly right. Also, they advanced this rather novel idea:
'"Lord Hutton does seem to suggest that is not enough for a broadcaster or a newspaper ... to simply report what a whistleblower or someone like Dr. Kelly says because they are an authoritative source. You have to demonstrate that it's true," **** told BBC radio Friday. "That would change the law in this country."'
What a 'shocking' concept! The story must be true?
Could it be that Bush acted properly also?
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=518&ncid=716&e=7&u=/ap/20040130/ap_on_re_eu/britain_weapons_adviser

Chowhound
Comic Vine
GameFAQs
GameSpot
Giant Bomb
TechRepublic