Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years.

Thanks,

CNET Support

General discussion

Back to XP, and loving it. [props to Vista haters]

Jul 25, 2007 4:15PM PDT

4 months ago, when I was checking the http://www.just4deal.com and found a great deal on dell and bought it. It was configured with windows vista

I was using Windows Vista 32bit for 2 months and then switched to 64 bit for the next 2 months.

Things were slow, startup, shutdown, normal working etc.

Some games ran slow (Halflife 2:Episode One, Company of Heroes), some games ran perfect (Oblivion Elder Scrols, Splinter Cell Chaos Theory).

Then I switched back to XP........guys, we have really degraded our thinking level. We guys used to complain about the slow startup and shut down speeds of XP.

After experienceing Vista, I found start-up and shut down speeds of XP extremely fast......I hope you get what Im trying to say here.

Yeah yeah Vists uses stuff like superfetch and bla bla bla, ok I get it, but where can I see the difference when I actually use it???????

And yeah, for gaming I need a minimum of 2 GB RAM, man are you kiddin me??!?!?!

These guys spent 5 years and 1 billion dollars and this is what we get????

Vista is just showbiz with a big mouth, form inside, it sucks hardcore.

Discussion is locked

- Collapse -
Tch! Tch! To Microsoft
Jul 25, 2007 6:26PM PDT

I hate to say this(especially considering the amount of resources required by Vista), but I agree with you!

For the most part, Vista is a whole lot of glorified menu and screen animations with all kinds of 3D colors, and that's about all I've seen of it. What I'd really like to hear about is what advantages Vista offers over XP...
Is it faster? Does it work better with the printer you used with your XP machine? Does it provide a better internet interface? Can you run your favorite programs and games on Vista like you did with XP? ...etc..

BTW, has anybody tried running a few old MSDOS programs on Vista? With XP, I can! I also run Win 3.1 programs... they work great!

In otherwords, I'd like to hear about Vista's "plus" side.

>Trublu

- Collapse -
(NT) Vista's Plus side??, You mean there is one!!
Jul 25, 2007 9:59PM PDT
- Collapse -
Yes Vista has it moments.
Jul 25, 2007 10:09PM PDT

My wife has a spiffy new Vista laptop. It handled with grace connecting the external projector without having to dive into the display properties and taping the usual Fn+F4 keys to cycle the displays till it worked.

Mind you I did eject Norton with prejudice and there was no real crapware on the machine so my experience is better than most.

Bob

- Collapse -
vista vs xp
Jul 27, 2007 11:43AM PDT

know what you are saying...VISTA sucks...just tried to scan from my hp all in one printer... guess what...no good...vista does not recognize it to scan...but it prints...just another problem to go with all the rest...

- Collapse -
Possible Scan "fix"
Jul 27, 2007 9:57PM PDT

Just a note to say I had the same problem with Vista and trying to get the HP scanner feature in my all in one (C7180) to 'function' with my new Dell E521 system. After numerous and various attempts to solve the situation, including an HP tech talk (no help) I stumbled across the solution! REMOVING the McAfee Virus software from the system!!! I'm now using the free AVAST antivirus program and everything works FINE! (I actually ended up doing a reinstall of Vista just to be certain I had COMPLETELY removed all the old virus files AS WELL as all the HP files prior to doing the HP reinstall.)

jan

- Collapse -
Tch! Tch! To Microsoft
Aug 5, 2007 10:35AM PDT

All the programs that ran on my XP machine run great under VISTA. Everything is faster, networking is absolutely awesome. Booting in 19-24 seconds with my Intel Core 2 Duo. There?s no comparison in my opinion.

I hate to be the bearer of bad news but in case you haven?t figured this out yet, nobody's making old MSDOS and Win 3.1 programs anymore.

Casey

- Collapse -
The positive side of Vista
Jul 27, 2007 2:08PM PDT

The positive side of Vista :
Search works wonders when looking for a detail in a document.
System diagnostics, Event Viewer
Speech Recognition
Photo Gallery, great with email and printing options
No problems with multiple USB peripherals
Loads faster then XP
The GUI

- Collapse -
XP has all these
Jul 30, 2007 10:11AM PDT

Search: you can get free third-party search tools for XP

System diagnostics, event viewer: not sure about these, but they probably aren't all that great and most likely have third-party counterparts for XP

Speech Recognition: Windows XP has this, and it can be upgraded

Photo Gallery: there are countless free and commercial apps for this

Multiple USB Peripherals: I don't know what you are talking about, I have tons of USB devices plugged into my XP machine with no problems.

Loads faster: I'd like to see some hard data backing that up...

The GUI: Wow, not that it really matters, but you can get plenty of add-ons that make XP look/act like Vista, some even free from Microsoft *gasp*

- Collapse -
OS Upgrade
Jul 27, 2007 2:34PM PDT

As soon as I started reading about Vista, I upgraded...to Ubuntu. Can't play the latest and greatest games, but I don't do that anyway. I'm happy as a clam.

- Collapse -
Ubuntu
Jul 28, 2007 4:58AM PDT

Do I have to partition my XP for use of Ubuntu? Any problems in using the two together on the same computer? I am looking for a Microsoft alternative but I am not going to cut my nose off to spite my face by going with Mac since I would be in the same boat. They are just as proprietary about their software as Microsoft has become if not worse. Where is are the systems that lets the consumer choose? Why do we have to be railroaded into using all of one or all of the other? If their products are as good they claim to be they won't be able to keep them on the shelves if they are garbage as most of the junk they force us to adjust to, is then they will stay on the shelf where they belong. Maybe I just answered my own question.

- Collapse -
Optional and possible...
Jul 28, 2007 5:12AM PDT

If you wish to install Ubuntu then yes, you would have to partition your hard drive. However, you can also boot to/run it from the Ubuntu LiveCD instead of installing it, avoiding some of the fuss and letting you try it out before committing. Problems with partitioning and boot manager issues can arise, but most are caused by user error and glitches can usually be dealt with.

John

- Collapse -
Vista Success Story (has to be one I suppose)
Jul 27, 2007 6:49PM PDT

Hi,
Every time I see forum posts on Vista, they always say slow startup, shutdown and working speed.
Whilst I agree that its NOT perfect, I have to say that my PC starts up FASTER than it did with XP Professional, and have found it much more stable (touch wood) than my previous XP installation, and I'm only running an Athlon XP 3000 with 1Gb ram and a Radeon 9600 agp card.
I will concede that certain "legacy" products have had problems, like my old Sony Clie Handheld which Vista won't recognise but thats just an excuse to get a new PDA. And yes, recent gaming releases needing twice the memory if running Vista rather than XP is a cause for concern.
Overall, I feel I must be one of the lucky ones who Vista has decided to behave for.
*** And no, I don't work for Microsoft Happy

- Collapse -
Vista is great
Jul 27, 2007 7:01PM PDT

Hi Guys, It makes me wonder how mankind has moved on, as a once dedicated X P freak I tried Vista when it first came out....wow and its still wow, so much hidden depth, I only have 2 minor faults, windows calendar and defender which have irritating pop ups, my gaming seems better than ever, you do need a Gig of memory but we knew that. I get my kicks from seeing if it does what it says on the box, sad I know but hay Ho.
All the best Mick

- Collapse -
Yes Vista made me buy a new laptop
Jul 27, 2007 8:29PM PDT

I have been following the history of Vista for a long time. I became so convinced that Vista would cause me trouble that I went out and bought a new laptop with Windows XP Pro so that I could get reliable operation with my printer and other peripherals for the forseeable future. Since I have never trusted MS with security I believe I am better off with free third party firewall and virus protection. Thus the claim of better security in Vista did not convince me.

- Collapse -
Pay, For Yet Another Operating System?
Jul 27, 2007 9:28PM PDT

One day we all have to face the truth, Microsoft are experts at brainwashing. I mean, its just an operating system, its not the program(s) we turn a computer on to use! XP works, no need to think about the operating system any more! Instead we proceed to start up the program/reason we pushed the "on" button for in the first place!

Now to put this in true perspective, Vista upgrades cost big money. Yet we search out free or inexpensive shareware programs, or buy programs that REALLY do something WE want, not fiddly things MS TELLS US we want! We shop pricing on programs or games that provide hours and hours of exactly what we wanted.

We've been had!

- Collapse -
Vista goes to XP or back to Walmart
Jul 27, 2007 10:31PM PDT

Do I hve to buy a complete install of xp? to replace vista? or is there some kind of a backwards upgdrade I can find? I got the little laptop at walmart w/vista, started installing Word,AOL,Streets and trips and a few other programs I use a lot...one is a Bible program called Quick Verse... Ive got that program on 2 other laptops and 3 other pc s it works great on xp and pro... but NOT on Vista also my Defrag program has stopped working and the support people at Vista say there is no Program restore option.. only a system restore which means I ll have to back up before the hours of installing my programs, do a system restore and then hope things work out when I start re installing.. good grief what a mess... I hate vista.....I just laid the new laptop over in the corner and thats where it will stay till I decide if Im going to take it back to Walmart or attempt another fix... thanks for any help or suggestions... Grant

- Collapse -
Take it back
Jul 27, 2007 11:34PM PDT

No real solution, I'd take it back and start fresh with a proper system. Lots of computer stores etc. will sell you a competitively priced XP Pro based system.

- Collapse -
back xp or Walmart
Jul 28, 2007 5:36AM PDT

Yep your probaly right.. however I got it on sale for less than $400 and its a small fast internal wifi laptop, sure was hopeing to keep it, my Toshiba is much larger and heaver... thanks Grant

- Collapse -
I could not find one
Jul 31, 2007 3:56AM PDT

I looked and looked for Xp on a computer and the ONLY place I found that had it available was dell. Maybe I did not look hasrd enaough but 3 days of looking you would think I could find something. Dell was the only place I found,

- Collapse -
Limited downgrade capabilities...
Jul 28, 2007 3:52AM PDT

One cannot downgrade Vista, meaning a complete reinstallation would be necessary. In addition, the right to receive a free downgrade to Windows XP is limited, making it doubtful that you'd qualify. Thus, you would have to purchase a full copy of Windows XP for installation.

Aside form that:
* What defrag program are you referring to? Windows Defragmenter or another?

* Windows XP didn't support individual program restoration either, only System Restore.

* System Restore automatically creates restore points before most individual installations, and you only have to revert as far back as you need to.

John

- Collapse -
back to xp or Walmart
Jul 28, 2007 5:30AM PDT

Thanks John for your reply...and I DO have a full install of XP and Pro as well... however I really dont want to go through the
"format c:" mess... I had hoped Vista would be ok... next, Of course Im talking about Windows Defrag! it has stopped working!!!! next, I know XP doesnt have a stand alone Program restore but I have Toshiba laptops that come with a PROGRAM RESTORE program that works great with XP and Pro but not VISTA... next, I know that the Vista system restore creates restore points... probaly you didnt understand my comments about that issue... I meant to say that if I go back to where my Windows defrag will work again, I will have to spend another 5 hours reloading all the programs I need again and who knows if one of them might knock the windows defrag out again.. I didnt have these problems when I loaded them on 95 or 98 or 2000Pro or XP... why should I be haveing them now??????

- Collapse -
Vista to XP
Jul 30, 2007 12:43AM PDT

As far as I know no one is offering a downgrade option but some manufacturers are now offering choice on a new computer purchased online such as Dell and Gateway. You can use the upgrade version of XP if - you have a previous version of Windows - Me or 98, during install it will ask you for the CD to verify you have a previous version, your only problem may be if the laptop has a SATA drive, XP will not see it for installing so you will need to disable this feature in BOIS if it is there, since nothing comes with a floppy drive any more getting the drivers on during install can be a chore. The other down side is hunting down XP drivers for the hard ware on the computer, video, LAN, modem, sound as XP may have the generic versions of some of them but you won't have full use of the features. It must be an XP CD that is not installed on any other computer, it can't be an OEM CD from another computer. Other then open source software I do not know of any software maker that allows you to use one copy on more then two computers - usually a laptop and a main computer are allowed.

As for the defrag program I have used this one and it seems to do the job and is free: http://www.iobit.com/iobitsmartdefrag.html I have never been a fan of Windows defrag as it is slow and frankly I don't take the time and never do it. Since I test software, a lot is beta, for allot of people before I recommend it to them I do allot of install and uninstall so for me I also run a reg cleaner now and then and usually every year or so I do a complete format and install to start over again so it's like getting a new computer.

I purchased "good deal" Vista computer and put over 30 children's games on it ranging from old 95 to this year, what I did with the older programs that didn't want to install, is open the CD and right click on the installer and choose 95/98 compatibility, close that down and double click on the installer and they installed and run fine on Vista, I had problems with this in XP. I am down to one old version of Motorcycle Madness that will not run correctly but it did not run great on XP either.

My thought is if I got a computer for around $300 it would not be a deal if I had to also purchase XP for it - ram is given since even on inexpensive XP machines when it first came out, I have purchased that and now it is at a low so for $24-44 on sale, I upgrade that, where XP with Service Pack 2 has a sweet spot of at least 512RAM I would say Vista is 1GIG. Since we are not serious gamers this has always worked for me.

I purchased a mid priced computer with Vista on it the day it came out I have been able to do pretty much everything I need to do on it, since then I have purchased a laptop and another computer with it on it. I did actually purchase the XP upgrade for my main computer when Nero, my U3 flash drive and HP all in one didn't work as expected and then decided to switch between the two with dual boot, now for the past month I have been in Vista only, I can do with out Nero, the all in one has HP supplied generic drivers which they gave MS and I didn't use the U3 program past using it to safely eject the drive.

My only grip is wasting horse power on an operating system when I would rather use it for the programs I run on the computer, I have found some computers deal with Vista fine and actually do better where others are just a dog with it on there no matter what you do, I do allot of tweaks on the operating system as I run programs on my computers not look at the eye candy of the operating system hence I have no need for Areo or slide in and out stuff - all that gets turned off - I like nice wallpaper that's it. I turn off User Account Control as I haven't had that for 12 years I don't need it now.

What I do find amusing is how people bashed XP and now it's the best thing since the wheel. This entire thing has been a win win situation for vendors, some people are buying new hardware to conform, some are buying XP to go back and then some are just coping and dealing and are able to move on with Vista with out much ado. I have gone from Windows 3 to 95, 95 to 98, 98 to Me, XP was the biggest jump and caused a stir, now Vista is the same hub bub but more people have computers and actually use them so the roar is louder. Not much of my current software would run on the old Pentium 166MHz I have here so we have progressed and paid for it each time.

Hope this helps,
Northlite

- Collapse -
No reasonable solution to Vista...Back to Walmart it goes!
Jul 31, 2007 10:15PM PDT

Thanks Northlite for your comments however it seems no solution to the Vista inadaquces are present or avaliable, I really liked the small light Acer laptop, which made it great for traveling, I also have a perfect size travel bag with it... I ll keep the bag and hope to find another small laptop like the Acer maybe an HP or another Toshiba, but I can guarantee it will have XL or Pro on it....but in the mean time my VISTA gets returned to Walmart... thanks again to all.... Grant

- Collapse -
Try Dell or HP
Jul 31, 2007 11:44PM PDT

Dell and HP still sell laptops with XP on them. After all the hue and cry a couple of months ago by those who didn't like the way Vista was going, Dell knuckled under and started selling XP machines again, as an option.

Microsoft will still support XP security patches until at least 2011, so that will give the market plenty of time for an alternative. Who knows, Microsoft may even rethink the way it does business by then. They may be knocking on wood, though...

- Collapse -
You are not alone
Aug 1, 2007 3:22AM PDT

WGA,

You are not alone. I spoke with a sales rep at Circuit City over the weekend and he said that they have had a lot of people return their computers because of Vista. Most people just want a new computer that they can turn on, add any of the games or programs that they have grown comfortable using and on which they depend, and get to work. Vista not only does not allow them to do this but they have to keep reaching in their pocket. Bells, whistles and cool applications get pretty old when you find out the trip you paid good money for never leaves the station and making you pay additional to get the train moving only succeeds in making you feel ripped off. Vista needs a whole new marketing campaign. People may not be so put off if they are told everything up front and if Microsoft is completely honest with them. Honesty, now that is a novel idea for a business plan.

- Collapse -
Vista and Sony CLie
Jul 28, 2007 12:25AM PDT

Can you tell me which SONY CLIE did not work with Vista....I have an NX70V.

- Collapse -
Clie and Vista - NOT
Jul 29, 2007 7:07PM PDT

Hi there,

I'm running a Sony Clie PEG-T625C, and Vista (Home Premium OEM)wouldn't recognise it.
Any ideas or work around would be very much appreciated.

Thank you.

- Collapse -
Reinstall XP, then compare.
Jul 30, 2007 9:59AM PDT

I'm not surprised your fresh install of Vista was faster, because your XP was probably far from its prime at that point. Do a clean install of XP and it will probably be even faster and you won't need a RAM upgrade or to replace your perfectly functioning "legacy" products.

- Collapse -
When is an operating system not just an operating system?
Jul 28, 2007 2:57AM PDT

I am in the market for a new laptop. I need the laptop for business but it wouldn?t hurt for it to have the ability to play a DVD while I am traveling during down time. I need it to have internet access but I have no real problem with it connecting to dial-up instead of being wireless because cost is indeed a factor. I have been searching for over a month for that sweet deal but every time I think that I may have found it the dreaded Vista monster comes up. When I have to add on the additional dollars for my software upgrades and the replacement of my software that is not Vista compatible the deal is not such a deal. What the heck is Microsoft thinking? At least they could have made the system backwards compatible that is if they really had any interest in satisfying their customer base. Now, I hear that Microsoft?s ulterior motive has to do with it?s grand plan to invade the internet by ?preparing a multi-layered platform designed to build and run Web-based services or on-premise software coupled with services.? I don?t think you have to be rocket scientist to read between the lines. We are being herded to the slaughter and if we keep going along with the status quo and paying into their scheme we are going to find ourselves the odd man out with the internet belonging to the surfer elites, the haves and the have mores. I think it is time for me to make the move to Linux and to develop some programming skills. Putting in my two cents while I still can.

Quoted from: http://news.com.com/8301-10784_3-9750850-7.html

- Collapse -
Backward's compatible
Jul 28, 2007 3:49AM PDT

The only software that didn't work with Vista was 8 years old.
Even Nero provided a free update patch. Ohotoshop 7 worked, no problem. Tried Linux the learning curve required a lot of time. I could use Vista on first bootup. The first few days with UAC were annoying, but that soon faded.