Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years.

Thanks,

CNET Support

General discussion

Audio Quality and Formats

Mar 20, 2010 11:51AM PDT

Hello there, I forget "exactly" where I just read this, but some where here on cnet in a newsletter, either reviews of mp3 players, or software or something like that, i can't find it now.
Anyway, It said that a couple formats compared to mp3 are much better (of course), but it said that a aac and or aiff (a couple different ones) I can't remember exactly, but they at 160 are as good as a .mp3 at 320, is that true ?.
So basically saying that those formats it mentioned were as good encoded at half the rate, or whatever.
I thought a mp3 at 320 was cd quality ?.
So .wav is the best right ?.
I wish I could find that darn article, dang it, might have had to do with Itunes, geez it was only about a month ago too.

Discussion is locked

- Collapse -
Yes I believe everything you said are correct, but...
Mar 20, 2010 12:40PM PDT

it's the situation that determine what you use. For example; I can't use aac because mp3 is all it support.

- Collapse -
Well Yeah
Mar 20, 2010 2:06PM PDT

That goes with out saying...Heh..Happy

- Collapse -
Then your point is...
Mar 21, 2010 2:50AM PDT

one format is better than another? I would say no, it depends on usages. I remember in the old day of mp3 on cd but now most dvd player can play mp3; and dvd discs are so inexpensive, encoding mp3 at high bitrate is no problem.

- Collapse -
If we're talking just quality
Mar 21, 2010 1:27PM PDT

There are definitely some better than others, especially since we know mp3's cut out a lot of stuff and then we have those formats that at half the bitrate are as good or better, so then we have a mp3@320 and aac or aiff @320 then ofcourse a .wav.. that then makes the mp3 poorer quality by far.

But there are a few questions and points in my original post, I just can't find that article ):

- Collapse -
Ok, let's take .wav;
Mar 21, 2010 3:40PM PDT

How many players supports the .wav format (not many). and the file size is large compares to mp3. There are 1 or 2 none-lousy format (I don't remember the name) and I have seen some player that support those format (but again..not many). So what's important; quality of sound or storage space (file size). Know what you want before going shopping for that player.

Like I said, you are correct in what you said. We don't need the article.

- Collapse -
Couple lossless audio compression codec;
Mar 21, 2010 4:35PM PDT

FLAC and OggPCM