I haven't watched the video, but personally I wouldn't have taken the example literally...
Also if they said "stronger", I would assume adding any string of numbers to any word, would be "stronger". IE "jeniffer" vs. "jeniffer1234" Maybe that's their point?
Regardless of how this is interpreted by others, I will forward your feedback to the CNET editorial team to be aware of this and how some folks may take the example literally--which I hope they don't.
Thanks for the feedback.
Best regards,
-Lee Koo
CNET Community
Me, as an electrical engineer, I watched cnet's "anti-malware-video" with great interest, BUT:
the video's suggestion recommended to people to CHANGE their password regularly with a (so called) 'stronger' password.
The video gave an example of a STRONGER password. For example:
"jeniffer1234".
The host of the video's first name was "Jeniffer", - the added numbers were SEQUENTIAL(!!!!). Me, being a former electrical engineer with focus on computer science thought only: "How on earth can cnet suggest THIS password as secure?!?
To further elaborate: I emigrated to Israel nearly 2 years ago. Upon arrival, I stayed in my relatives 'palace', protected by a HUGE gate. I carried 4 suite cases, three boxes, my fishing gear and a net.
At first, I thought:
"Praise the Almighty! At least, I get a break, until my sister looks for her key to UNLOCK her door
of her house."
Nonsense! she "pushed" the HUGE & HEAVY door open with her pinky finger.
The remaining protection-schemes could be easily circumvented by babies!
I don't want to divulge the shtupid protection here on the internet (because our TV's will get STOLEN IN ONE HOUR), but it want to print it out and show it to my sister
. (Maybe then, she will take action...)

Chowhound
Comic Vine
GameFAQs
GameSpot
Giant Bomb
TechRepublic