In the Eye of the Beholder
Imagine if we?d reported and opined on WWII the way we do now.

VDH precedes his editorial with the following intro:
I think Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Henry Stimson, and George Marshall conducted the Second World War brilliantly, despite ?thousands of mistakes.? But I can also envision how our present intelligentsia and punditocracy would have sized up their sometimes less than perfect efforts or applied their own reporting to the struggle against Japan and Germany. So imagine something like the following op-ed appearing, say, around May 1, 1945.

The Present Debacle

May 21, 1945?After the debacles of February and March at Iwo Jima, and now the ongoing quagmire on Okinawa, we are asked to accept recent losses that are reaching 20,000 dead brave American soldiers and yet another 50,000 wounded in these near criminally incompetent campaigns euphemistically dubbed ?island hopping.?

Meanwhile, we are no closer to victory over Japan. Instead, we are hearing of secret plans of invasion of the Japanese mainland slated for 1946 or even 1947 that may well make Okinawa seem like a cake walk and cost us a million casualties and perhaps involve a half-century of occupation. The extent of the current Kamikaze threat, once written off as the work of a ?bunch of dead-enders,? was totally unforeseen, even though such suicidal zealots are in the process of inflicting the worst casualties on the U.S. Navy in its entire history.

Worse still, our sources in the intelligence community speak of a billion-dollar boondoggle now underway in the American southwest. This improbable ?super-weapon? (with the patently absurd name ?Manhattan Project??in the midst of a desert no less!) promises in one fell swoop to erase our mistakes and give us instant deliverance from our blunders?no concern, of course, for the thousands of innocents who would be vaporized if such a monstrous fantasy bomb were ever actually to work....

Please read the whole thing!