Speakeasy forum

General discussion

Ann Coulter - "Israel's response is disproportionate" ...

by Edward ODaniel / July 21, 2006 4:43 AM PDT
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=16120&o=ANN001

I knew the events in the Middle East were big when the New York Times devoted nearly as much space to them as it did to a New York court ruling last week rejecting gay marriage.

Some have argued that Israel's response is disproportionate, which is actually correct...


Yep, she really said it, and the rest of the article is also pretty much on the money and to the point.
Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: Ann Coulter - "Israel's response is disproportionate" ...
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: Ann Coulter - "Israel's response is disproportionate" ...
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
The rest of the article....
by Josh K / July 21, 2006 4:54 AM PDT

....is her usual barrage of bile. That's too bad; her support for Israel gets lost in it.

Collapse -
Call it what you want...
by Edward ODaniel / July 21, 2006 4:59 AM PDT

but the accuracy can't be denied.

Collapse -
Sure it can....
by Josh K / July 21, 2006 6:01 AM PDT

....unless you're as loony as she is.

Collapse -
Care to try pointing out...
by Edward ODaniel / July 22, 2006 6:41 AM PDT
In reply to: Sure it can....

where you think she was factually in error?

Bet you can't.

Collapse -
Already did it in another post in this thread
by Josh K / July 22, 2006 7:24 AM PDT

If you believe all that nonsense she wrote, more's the pity, Ed.

Collapse -
No, you tried but didn't succeed...
by Edward ODaniel / July 22, 2006 7:37 AM PDT

in even one instance.

It is easy to point to the party of the President BUT that ignores the party in control of congress that actually has to support of choose not to support the president.

I suggest you read the response to your post (and please do check on the facts as I cited them).

Collapse -
You're splitting hairs as usual
by Josh K / July 22, 2006 10:12 AM PDT

She said ''never'' and spoke of Democrats in general. She didn't make exceptions for occasions when the Democrats were in the White House. Those statements were untrue as I illustrated.

Collapse -
Me splitting hairs? How so?
by Edward ODaniel / July 22, 2006 11:37 AM PDT

Coulter indicated Democrats in general and it is you trying to claim a Republican administration hampered by a Democrat controlled congress pulled out of Lebanon.

It was the DEMOCRATS who held majorities in congress who left no other option.

Ann is aware that there are some few old time Democrats such as Miller and Lieberman who are exceptions to the rule just as Truman was an exception to the rule and thus ostracized by his own party.

Collapse -
Would those be the same Democrats in Congress....
by Josh K / July 23, 2006 2:16 AM PDT

....who prevented him from bombing Tripoli and invading Grenada?

Collapse -
Yes they would ...
by Edward ODaniel / July 23, 2006 10:38 AM PDT

but some of the time even they get it right because from a political point of view NOT doing something about Grenada because of the medical students there. They were also supportive because they saw it as something to take the fact that they wouldn't support Reagan's desire to deal with Lebanon off the pages of the friendly papers.

Far as Tripoli, the same Democrats had to do something because the Gulf of Sirte naval clash was reminiscent of the Pueblo incident that had cost them a lot of political capital and '86 was after all an election year.

When forced by politics and the ever popular "public opinion polls" Democrats run from the big ones if they can manage with a little one.

Collapse -
So you acknowledge....
by Josh K / July 23, 2006 11:07 PM PDT
In reply to: Yes they would ...

...that Coulter was either mistaken (unlikely as I assume she has some knowledge of American History) or lying when she said Democrats always run from a fight.

Thanks, that's all I was getting at.

Collapse -
Not at all Josh
by Edward ODaniel / July 24, 2006 4:23 AM PDT
In reply to: So you acknowledge....

They were running from fights each time and simply tripped over another they couldn't run from. Had they any other chioce than political suicide they would have run out on them too.

Collapse -
(NT) (NT) LOL, you hold onto that, Ed
by Josh K / July 24, 2006 4:28 AM PDT
In reply to: So you acknowledge....
Collapse -
Liberals simply cannot make, or follow, a logical train of
by Kiddpeat / July 22, 2006 1:06 PM PDT

reasoning. Failing in that endeavor, they try to talk you under the table.

It's a wonder to behold.

Collapse -
(NT) (NT) So is your stereotyping, KP
by Josh K / July 23, 2006 2:16 AM PDT
Collapse -
Well, that's progress.
by Kiddpeat / July 23, 2006 3:30 AM PDT

There actually is a logical connection this time. Now, you need to learn to distinguish reality from wishful thinking.

Collapse -
(NT) (NT) Cough*ad hominem*cough
by dirtyrich / July 22, 2006 12:04 AM PDT
Collapse -
Now, now,
by duckman / July 22, 2006 12:06 AM PDT

only liberals are allowed to use that card

Collapse -
(NT) (NT) Ahem! Didn't you mean ad feminam? LOL
by Evie / July 22, 2006 9:16 PM PDT
Collapse -
(NT) (NT) there's an 'a heminum'
by WOODS-HICK / July 24, 2006 5:00 AM PDT
Collapse -
what is truly disproportionate
by WOODS-HICK / July 21, 2006 5:24 AM PDT

is the amount of ink wasted on ac's wisdom. start 'lock clock' now.

Collapse -
(NT) (NT) 1
by duckman / July 21, 2006 5:30 AM PDT
Collapse -
You are entitled to your "thoughts"...
by Edward ODaniel / July 22, 2006 6:45 AM PDT

although it is clear from the way you worded them that you didn't bother to see that all she stated and cited is upheld on a strong foundation of fact.

She too can merely lead an *** to the water (knowledge), she can't force it to drink (learn).

Collapse -
she had no trouble leading you
by WOODS-HICK / July 22, 2006 11:06 AM PDT

I prefer not to share your experience.

Collapse -
Of course you don't...
by Edward ODaniel / July 22, 2006 11:39 AM PDT

many of you hybrids seem to prefer remaining thirsty.

Collapse -
won't ever drink from your well
by WOODS-HICK / July 23, 2006 7:24 AM PDT
In reply to: Of course you don't...

someone poisoned it.

Collapse -
It's only poison for those who prefer fantasy to truth.
by Kiddpeat / July 23, 2006 7:27 AM PDT

Even good fantasy should be grounded in truth.

Collapse -
(NT) (NT) 3
by WOODS-HICK / July 23, 2006 7:30 AM PDT
Collapse -
(NT) (NT) -3
by WOODS-HICK / July 23, 2006 10:15 PM PDT
In reply to: (NT) 3
Collapse -
(NT) (NT) arent you thirsty yet?
by Mark5019 / July 23, 2006 7:44 AM PDT
Popular Forums
icon
Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
icon
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
icon
Laptops 21,181 discussions
icon
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
icon
Phones 17,137 discussions
icon
Security 31,287 discussions
icon
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
icon
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
icon
Windows 10 2,657 discussions

CNET FORUMS TOP DISCUSSION

Help, my PC with Windows 10 won't shut down properly

Since upgrading to Windows 10 my computer won't shut down properly. I use the menu button shutdown and the screen goes blank, but the system does not fully shut down. The only way to get it to shut down is to hold the physical power button down till it shuts down. Any suggestions?