aggravated assault. Can he plead "not guilty" by reason of insanity? ![]()
![]() | Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years. Thanks, CNET Support |
Discussion is locked
aggravated assault. Can he plead "not guilty" by reason of insanity? ![]()
...feed him? He'll feel like he got something put there. ![]()
I've found nothing in the scriptures that negates self defense needed past the point of insults. A soft answer may turn away wrath, but when it doesn't, it must be dealt with appropriately. Even Jesus explained it in several ways, such as "if a good man knows the hour a theif will come, he will NOT allow his house to be broken into", and " obey those in authority, they bear not the sword in vain", and some others that show Jesus respected the use of force when necessary, so long as it was justified.
it translates as "on earth, peace to men of good will" (or slight variations thereof). I don't know what that means you're supposed to do to those who are not of good will but I doubt it suggests that a punch to the gut is necessarily justified.
Xmas amnesty by Jehovah towards 'all men', instead of just those with good will. ("Good" meaning in God's eyes.)
What [one] is supposed to do to those not of good will is nothing; that gets done at Armageddon by the only one with the right to do so. That's why it's called "good news". ![]()
maybe they should keep a net handy , capture him like a wild animal
Digger
WOW... 4 officers against 1 prisoner. The prisoner didnt have any weapons on him right?
How in the world... this is crazy! I wonder what happened to the prisoner. So glad to hear that the officers are getting recovering. Hope they don't have any long time effects on their body / head.