Totally discounting the "message" of this article, IMO, the author must have 'had a ball' as he chose his words and put it together:
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/burtis060306.htm
![]() | Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years. Thanks, CNET Support |
Totally discounting the "message" of this article, IMO, the author must have 'had a ball' as he chose his words and put it together:
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/burtis060306.htm
Discussion is locked
for one of our more eloquent members? hmmmmmmm
the air in that balloon is very fresh. I do not think she will run. she is more effective as meat for the mongrels of the elite light wing media. she is doing fine in ny and will continue to raise money for both parties. I think the dems will run a dark horse the nation will be very willing to ride.
*fr. pen name
even liberal me sees all kinds of downsides to her run. here's a few: last name, a woman, husband's name, her support for iraq, her name, ne liberal, plus every attack in standby mode ready to launch, etc. if she didn't have the baggage she would do quite well. if any other person with her resume ran I think they could win. then being a woman might be a plus.
I'll make this a twofer, m5019, george's dad was our last three term president.