Attention: The forums will be placed on read only mode this Saturday (Oct. 20, 2018)

During this outage (6:30 AM to 8 PM PDT) the forums will be placed on read only mode. We apologize for this inconvenience. Click here to read details

Speakeasy forum

General discussion

America's Secret Plan to Invade Canada

by EdH / May 3, 2006 7:42 AM PDT
Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: America's Secret Plan to Invade Canada
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: America's Secret Plan to Invade Canada
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
Did you see the gravity plane?
by Dragon / May 3, 2006 9:52 AM PDT
Collapse -
I'd be skeptical ...
by Bill Osler / May 3, 2006 11:11 AM PDT

Although parts of the design sound feasible, a good chunk of it sounds like 'perpetual motion' to me. I doubt that the physics actually work out after including losses related to friction and other inefficiencies.

Collapse -
Would really depend on the
by duckman / May 3, 2006 11:57 AM PDT
In reply to: I'd be skeptical ...

selected "p" value

Collapse -
by EdH / May 3, 2006 12:16 PM PDT
In reply to: I'd be skeptical ...

But unlike perpetual motion schemes, it uses an external energy source; gravity, so you're not getting something for nothing. Might be feasible.

Damn interesting.

Collapse -
Or, rather the combination..
by EdH / May 3, 2006 12:26 PM PDT
In reply to: Maybe...

of gravity and the varying temps and altitudes. Kind of like an internal weather system maybe (as an analogy). Friction and leakage would take their toll eventually, but it could last a long long time.

Collapse -
It's not much of a secret, it's been reported on since the
by Ziks511 / May 3, 2006 11:06 PM PDT

1930's. I actually made reference to this but Kidpeat went completely ballistic and denied that the US had ever had such a plan, that the US had never been a threat to Canada, and that Canada had lived under the protection of the US since 1779. Amazing how little history most people know. And when you offer them books, free, they decline.


Collapse -
Talk about leaks...
by EdH / May 4, 2006 2:39 AM PDT

they must have had pretty severe ones if a plan made in 1934 and declassified in 1974 was reported "since the 1930's"! How this makes the US a threat against Canada is beyond me; it was a contingency plan only, to counter a "what if" threat from Britain.

And note that Canada had similar plans to attack the USA siunce the 20's. So were they a threat agianst the US?

Did you even read the article? Or did you spend your time composing a slam against another member instead?

Popular Forums

Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
Laptops 21,181 discussions
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
Phones 17,137 discussions
Security 31,287 discussions
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
Windows 10 2,657 discussions


Your favorite shows are back!

Don’t miss your dramas, sitcoms and reality shows. Find out when and where they’re airing!