I have owned a Hewlet Packard (HP) AIO printer for about 5 years.
It has done everything that I wanted to do with printing and scanning.
My brother has a late model HP AIO that he bought for about $100.
It works fine for him.
I recently bought an Epson V500 stand alone scanner for one of my other computers. I already had a good printer on it and wanted a scanner that can handle the occasional slide or negative.
Other than the slides and negatives, I can't see that it has any advantage over my old HP AIO.
If you need a printer and a scanner, I see no reason to buy two separate units, when the AIO can do both.
..
.
Hi All, I posted this query previously on the Computer Peripherals forum and had no responses. Thought I'd give it a shot here...
I have neither a printer nor a photo scanner at this point. I am looking to purchase both but am curious if there are any AIO printers that have photo scanning capabilities equivalent to non-professional dedicated photo scanners.
I don't have the need to scann slides or negatives; just scanning prints.
I am not an amateur photographer. I just have years of old snapshots I'd like to scan into digital form.
To give you an idea of what I am looking at cost and quality-wise, If I get a dedicated scanner I have decided on the Epson V300 (about $100), and if I get an AIO printer I am probably going with the Canon PIXMA MP640 or MP990 ($100 to $150).
Will those All in one's "measure up" against the Epson scanner?
What am I losing or missing out on if I go the AIO route instead of a dedicated scanner?
Any other AIO suggestions that may have better scanning ability than the Canon's (preferably below $200).
Thanks!

Chowhound
Comic Vine
GameFAQs
GameSpot
Giant Bomb
TechRepublic