40 total posts
(Page 1 of 2)
(NT) Sickening :-(
im just glad the american voters
showed him and his kind the door
False premise piled on false premise, typical Boortz.
Of course Democrats are appalled by 9/11, and it figures in all of their thinking, not least because Bush's management of the war has stirred up so many more terrorists threatening the US. They think the Bush Admin is creating up more trouble for the future with its application of inverted Teddy Roosevelt diplomacy "Speak loudly and insultingly (UN Ambassador Bolton) and swing wildly with a big stick".
Get a grip, if the US had cleaned up Afghanistan without getting involved in Iraq, it might have found that Iran was a bigger threat than Iraq, and might have found a valid reason like their nuclear program to go in and kick their Taliban out. Iraq might then have offered the US a reason to go in, like attacking Iran after the US left, and then the US could have gone in with some legitimacy and with a lot less of this "insurgent" terrorist cr@p. All the trouble has arisen from building the Iraq war on a pack of lies about WMDs and their threat to the US.
What do you think ...
... of what Gore said? The current Saudi visa policy is not lenient enough for him? This is NOT about Iraq, do try to focus.
Wow! If this is true, I can't imagine what the man could be
thinking. What would the American people think if they heard him say this?
(NT) Well, Boortz doesn't, anyway.
I suppose it would have been nice.....
....to have included some actual quotes from Gore's speech, but then Boortz wouldn't have been able to post his more creative comments about it. 9/11 never happened? Really? Gore said that? Gore thought that? Gore implied that?
Op/Ed pieces really aren't news
Op/Ed pieces really aren't news... They are just what they purport to be... opinion and little more.
Thanks for the extra refference
Truly another act of pandering to the audience. The man needs to realize he still represents the US government and act with the dignity that his former office demanded of him.
if you took time to read theres a link
if you need help with a big word ask for help ok we wouldnt want you to be puzzled.
both you and dan would serve your fellow dimocrats better if you took time to read.
Mark...are you singlehandedly trying
to get Speakeasy shut down??? Geez, stop the attacks already!
I know you're not the only one, but you're a major one, and it makes it really hard for others not to respond in kind.
The whole tone here is back to where it was before the warning from Lee and the Mods.
If this place suddenly doesn't load one day, well, it was nice knowin y'all.
gee Cindy if you would had seen
this post from josh
"I suppose it would have been nice.....
....to have included some actual quotes from Gore's speech, but then Boortz wouldn't have been able to post his more creative comments about it. 9/11 never happened? Really? Gore said that? Gore thought that? Gore implied that? "
so where was my attack to point out if he read it?
guess you didn't read his reply so if my reply is an attack thats ridiculous as you can see.
so i dont see your view as you dont see joshs, dk(the special mod) terry, robs, and others
cindy your wrong this time but its ok i have broad shoulders i can take your venting
Josh was commenting on Boortz's piece
And saying it would be nice if Boortz included more actual quotes, etc.
You on the other hand, put Josh down with
"if you took time to read"
"if you need help with a big word ask for help ok we wouldnt want you to be puzzled"
and then dragged Dan into it with
"both you and dan would serve your fellow dimocrats better if you took time to read"
I DID say that you were not the only one causing problems, and I DO see the responses by the others. I see that they skirt direct attacks, choosing instead to write just enough to encourage you to let 'em have it with both barrels, which is JUST as dispicable in my view, yet they are not attacking you personally.
Please, stop giving them satisfaction.
and cindy the article had a link
to the whole item so when josh didnt either take time or see it.
so his comments were wrong as he has to read article
ive jumped before
but i wasnt attacking him as he was attacking me in his way:)
OK, I read it.....
....and I still don't see any of the things Boortz said were in there. Criticizing Abu Ghraib or whatever is nowhere near forgetting 9/11 ever happened.
Boortz is off base...
and writing with an agenda designed to inflame.
Gore did not acquit himself well though. If he feels so strongly that Arabs have been abused... then he should be making these statements in the US, to a US audience that could pressure our government to change. In short... He's complaining to the wrong people.
Let's just take the visa issue
Gore is whacked. How many of the 9/11 hijackers were in this country on ''student visas'' without really studying anything? And how many had overstayed their visas? Even the 9/11 Commission concluded we need to change that policy and enforcement. Now Gore suggests that we are playing into al Quaeda's hands by enforcing our visa laws and/or tightening up who we let in the country? If we had done that pre-9/11, we might not even have that infamous date
A caller to a talk show I heard today, made a good point. This was seditious behavior. In a time of war, this man went to the ''house'' of a supposed ally (of questionable loyalty) and essentially proceeded to try to turn them against us!
Hang him high IMO!
i saw where he said what gore said in article about rounding up
but you and i hardly will agree.
were better off with a president who will protect us not sell us out
As I am positive you realize...
that is Boortz's opinion. I don't necessarily agree with it but it does seem that way sometimes reading and listening to liberals.
Anyway, one doesn't need bombast to see that Gore is simply ridiculous.
When it comes to sucking up to the Saudis.....
.....Gore isn't even in the same league as George H.W. Bush.
or jimmy the president
who could have stopped this in the bud.
but he had no balls to go into iran show them what happens when you mess with us.
when they held those hostages he talked to them tried to make nice.
what he should have said if you dont release them in 24 hrs we will take action and followed threw with it.
yes they prb have killed the hostages as there such a nice people.
jimmy carter screwed it up
Holy flying pigs, I actually agree with you
I've said pretty much that same thing many times, that the worldwide expansion of Islamic terrorism began in 1979 when Jimmy Carter didn't react strongly enough to the hostage crisis. I think bin Laden has openly stated that this was the turning point.
But the Bush family still does have a longstanding business relationship with the Saudis.
Doesn't that make Gore's comments ...
... seem even more "out there" on this issue?
Our mistreatment of prisoners has nothing to do with the Bush family's relationship with the Saudis, not that I can see.
(NT) and thats???
Google Bush Saudis business
There are many hits to choose from. Some are admittedly left-leaning websites but as long as they source their information it should be reliable.
You may also want to Google Bush "Carlyle Group." There's some eye-opening information there too.
Talk about subscribing to conspiracy theories!
The 'Carlyle Group' sounds like the 'Trilateral Commission' and its supposed nefarious activities.
Back to Speakeasy forum
(Page 1 of 2)