92 total posts
(Page 1 of 4)
Before we get into that...
would you mind answering my question from yesterday about HOW exactly the FBI is violating the Constitution by monitoring radical groups? You knowing so much more than the rest of us about the "Founding Fathers" (disrespectful quotation marks noted) and all.
I'll leave it to others to decide whether or not Christian and Enlightened are mutually exclusive.
Thanks ever so.
I'm still looking for an answer as to if the RCMP or other law enforcement in Canada monitor groups or individuals, especially those undesirables that go to Canada then worm on down to the U.S.
Yes they do, actually its a separate organization because
the RCMP screwed the pooch big-time having studied at the feet of J. Edgar Whoosis, and collected files on everybody. There was an investigation at the end of the 70's and a new organization was set up peopled by most of the same officers from the RCMP. Pity.
The domestic surveillance organization that replaced the RCMP is the Canadian Security and Intelligence Service or CSIS pronounced SeeSis. They don't do very well, and their primary function is preventing foreign nationals from carrying on their former domestic conflicts on Canadian soil.
Sikh extremists blew up an Air India flight over the Atlantic killing more than 300. Since Canada is 1/10th the size of the United States that was exactly comparable to the loss of life of the World Trade Center. The trial took about 12 years and the perps got off because of CSIS bungling. It was a damn shame.
you'll NEVER get a valid (or rational) answer to your question
I'm willing to give Rob the benefit of the doubt.
Here you go, though I doubt you'll like it.
My response, in case you missed it
Damn, a lovely, extensive reply nuked by an interruption in
my internet service, never to be seen again. I will try to cobble together a simulacrum of it, but it is unlikely to be as good as the original. Later.
(NT) Try for accuracy over sarcasm or fancy dancing
(NT) And what about that heater core Rob?
(NT) Something I never could do well.
(NT) I did my pipe bending next to the dumpster.
Pretty good Bill
But this was assigned to Rob.
I will allow Rob to complete the assignment if he doesn't copy your answer.
75% of my work has been building, installing & mostly continued maintenance of food and dairy plants. with the remainder in construction of commercial office buildings and building prison complexes. I've made many more concentrics running pipe in food plants all with rigid conduit.
Mr. California Republican
assigned to Rob.
Excuse me for spoiling your ambush.
Not an ambush
Simply trying to understand how Rob is assembled and if any real work went into his artwork, as he shows his condecending attitude of people who work for a living.
Sorry if I offended you as it is not my intent. My appology to you sir.
Exellent reply on the bends though I was impressed.
Not offended and no problem.
I did enjoy bending pipe, (under 2" rigid, that is)
for me anything over 1''
Rigid is done by machine, and most of the time the 1'' is done in a Chicago bender.
Not enough lead in my a$$ for the big stuff.
Although I've seen guys bending 1-1/2'' rigid with a hand bender (big Guys mind you)
Mr. California Republican
Oil refinery jobs I've rassled 4" and 6" rigid (with much help)
1" and Chicago bender about my limit also, I just hate lugging anything above 2" rigid.
Never had any luck bending 1 1/2 or larger by hand.
Re: big guys mind you
i was watching a guy i work with bend 12mm stainles steel rods, 10" long 90 degree bend in the middle, with a hand bender locked in a vice...
he had his rhythm and was "doing his thing"...
he's about 5' 10" and weighs about 300lbs
i jokingly said "c'mon oren, you can do better than that"
he said "oh yeah? come show me how"
well, walked over, he put a rod in the bender and said "be my guest"....
what is it they say about "the moving force and the immovable object"?
that rod just lay there and laughed at me (in an "immovable way").....
since then i have "respect" for big guys...
(NT) Sorry, I don't understand.
Go here for some clarification
I'm sorry but I'll be no help with the heater core.
I assume it is the segment of the car's cooling system that allows it to function as the heat source for the interior heater, but I don't really know. Cars are not my strong suit.
I did help rebuild a 1927 Model A Ford in my youth along with my father. I fabricated door panel stiffening from linoleum and covered it with cloth. I fixed the window winding system, and I also helped some with re-wiring the engine but I was a follower rather than a leader. I can do decent carpentry though, I've built tables and chairs for our cottage, and a vanity with cupboards and sink. Laid a large flagstone patio on a bed of sand that's still there and still flat after 40+ years.
I used to be a reasonably good builder of radio control models, including the electrics, and had a business in high school making customized plastic models of WW2 aircraft for vets. But all that is about 30+ years in the past. I still read up on it occasionaly and marvel at the changes. Electric power interests me if I ever get back into it.
My job as a Respiratory Equipment Technician required me to take apart Oxygen regulators and repair them, and to do the same with suction equipment, both things needing re-calibration because they require precision. I didn't do the same with ventilators but only because they had a service contract. My work as an Ambulance Attendant required me to think on my feet and not to panic. I've delivered 2 babies, and have attended innumerable accidents involving broken arms, broken legs, broken backs, and broken faces. Yes I went to school for that, but books are nothing compared to the real thing.
You can believe me or not, but I once ran a cardiac arrest resuscitation in a hospital. The circumstances were these: new staff rotate or start on July 1. The arrest took place about July 3rd at about 2 AM. The interns were straight out of med-school, the residents were either brand new as residents or had never been in charge of an arrest before. Having absorbed the fact that nobody was in charge, I started asking questions in a loud voice of nobody in particular, questions like "What are his blood gasses?" to which one of the doctors said "Has anybody drawn blood gasses? We should do that." Then I'd say "Maybe he needs some Calcium Gluconate." And somebody would decide that was a good idea. I asked a bunch more questions of the walls and things got done but we were unsuccessful in reviving the patient. I got the amazed thanks of the nurses involved "You were just like a doctor !!" I also received a commendation from the Hospital via the Nursing Supervisor who attended the arrest. Whether you believe this unverifiable story or not I care not one iota.
I used to have a home business called the Audible Difference which offered custom audio consulting and cabinetry made by yours truly. That meant I helped people buy decent equipment at a small discount, but it meant that all components were not only compatible but durable. I also did home installations of the equipment including wiring up remote speakers for different areas of the house.
I am a techie for most of my friends who are intimidated by computers, VCR's and the like, but I claim no real expertise, I'm sure virtually anybody here could out techie me. I have successfully recovered lost or corrupted files both at work and for a friend who is an author though, but only once. The second time it happened, neither I nor what turned out to be the Al Qaeda linked Computer place close to him were unable to recover the lost material. I know they were Al Qaeda because they were arrested by the RCMP and CSIS about 2 months after 9/11. All Muslims.
I am currently renovating our house, having demolished a wall and re-wired a lost circuit for lights, but I admit to looking the details up in an old Readers Digest Home Fix It book. I am less good at plumbing but I have installed 2 new sinks here and fixed a plumbing leak. We need to dig out part of the basement because its uncomfortably low ceilinged, and we need a new furnace and central air. I'll help with digging out the basement but the rest is for the pros including the footings underpinning and drainage, but at least I know about those things.
But outside of participation in some anti-war activities, being teargassed in May 1968 in Paris, and just missing the August roll in of Tanks in Prague I did learn most of my history from books the way most people do. I learned to shoot, and to canoe from my father, and I learned to sail mostly by myself, although I have read books about that too.
How'd I do?
Thanks for reminding me Don. Back when I first got together
with Nancy I built this great bed. We needed our rather large single room to be as multifunctional as possible and besides all the book shelves I build a variety of platform bed to suit a queen size mattress. The way it worked was this. I built an archway of 1x10 set edgwise against the wall. There was a shelf at the bottom about 15 inches above the floor, and the archway itself was about 89 inches tall from the floor to the top crosspiece. Fastened to the shelf about 15 inches from the floor by heavy duty hinges (4) was a piece (well 2 pieces really) of 3/4 inch plywood joined at the center by a long metal strip on each side of the ply bolted together through the ply, and which was overall the size of the queen size mattress plus 4 inches on each side and about 12 inches at the foot. There was vertical framing of 1x4 on both sides to hold the mattress in place, and a foot piece which could fold flat on hinges or be hooked to the sides to keep the mattress in place tightly to the wall within the archway. Inside the archway on the wall was a brass rubbing behind plexiglas about 6 feet tall which I had picked up in England when I had taken a year off after my undergrad degree. There were 2 legs in the middle and a single arched piece at the end all on hinges that folded flat to the underside of the platform when the bed was folded up against the wall, and it was all painted a flat black so that they virtually disappeared. There was a different brass rubbing behind plexiglas on the undersurface of the bed betwee the legs. Just release the bottom mattress brace and pull the mattress down 8 inches or so and then lift the platform up against the arch. You didn't even have to make the bed, just smooth the comforter or blankets a bit and it folded up like a Murphy bed and disappeared held in place by another couple of hooks and eyes near the top. The archway formed the edges of bookcases on either side of the bed, and we both had desks in the room and some chairs so it converted quickly either to study space or to entertainment space with a bed that was invisible. I had a big thing for medieval and renaissance music then so the brass rubbings fit right in.
I have seen similar units recently which are quite professional and expensive and much easier to raise up because they have spring assist. Ours was cheap and worked great if a bit awkward and heavy on the way up and the way down. And the 3/4 ply was nice and bouncy !! Nudge, nudge.
If I ever get round to making a website, I'll include photos of the shelving and entertainment units I've built. Also the wonderful scar on my left index finger where I tried and failed to cut my finger off.
Regardless of the great names of the
"Founding Fathers" or whether they had or did not have any sort of religious belief, nary a one of them was more worthy of setting foot on having any say so in in determining the direction of the new country than was the very least "dirt farmer" or other ragamuffin that struggled to leave an old land for a new one.....and the dirt farmers were hymn singin' bible readers. Take that, Rob!
But that's not what has been said here. We have been assure
d by all and sundry from the Right at SE that the Founding Fathers were deeply religious bible observing fundamentalists who would have posted the Ten Commandments if they had thought of it, despite all evidence to the contrary.
It is also both foolish and wrong to assume that language was used in the 18th Century as it is today. Most students have to spend an extended time learning to decipher what was intended, which gives rise to fascinating little debates over obscure passages among the historian community which rarely come to light outside the specialist community.
While Jefferson refers to God quite a lot, he also expresses severe doubts about religions and their advocates "priests", especially Presbyterians (my childhood heart is bleeding, that's how I was raised). God was more present then but was invoked in a much more casual way than the preachers and politicians of the 21st Century. Had an 18th Century Presidential candidate said "I believe God wants me to be President", he would have been laughed out of the room, out of the County and out of the State. Hubris or Malignant Pride was a recognized failing then, though alas no longer. Bush's subsequent disclaimer would have counted for nothing because the first half of the statement would have been so offensive to the believing congregations and their Enlightenment counterparts.
First of all, that's complete bullpucky...
NO ONE has asserted such. Secondly, the Founding Fathers were, for the most part religious people.
Spin it as you will
But, are you really searching for the truth
or just wanting to debunk what you feel is a popular thought from those you oppose today? My assertion is that the desires of the "Founding Fathers" is no more (or less) important than that of the common citizen of that day. My assertion goes for, what you might call, "right" or "left" thinking....but these are words/labels that I abhor, Rob. This topic has been hashed and rehashed here ad nauseum and there is no new information to offer. All those of these early days are dead. They cannot speak. Nearly all that was written came from those who had better command of language, higher educations, and access to a pen and publisher. The rest remains in oral traditions and such. You cannot neglect the desires of these citizens but you will be hard pressed to interview them. As such, this arguement has little ability to bring to finality, IMO.
The problem with your posts Rob is that one cannot get past
the first paragraph or two before being stopped by a blatant error. Fundamentalists didn't exist in the 1700s. The term originates from the late 1800s and early 1900s with the hot debate between liberal and conservative Christians. One, or more, of the conservatives decided that it would be a good thing to document the basic beliefs that define the Christian church. Hence, a book was written. It is called 'The Fundamentals', and the liberals quickly seized the opportunity to begin caricaturing their opponents with the term 'Fundamentalist'. As is usually the case with liberals, the caricature beared little resemblance to the original statement of belief.
Other, similar terms have been used in the past. For example, a well known Scottish movement was referred to as Covenanters for their adoption of a covenant that spelled out their beliefs.
Back to the issue at hand. There were no fundamentalists at the time the Founding Fathers lived and worked.
Sorry, I was using the word fundamentalists as a descriptive
not in the way we use it today, it was wrong for me to have used it in this confusing and careless way. It is later people who have attempted to tie the religious beliefs of the late 18th century to what is known as Fundamentalism today. I accept your correction of my sloppy usage, and agree that Fundamentalism is at least a late 19th Century concept if not an early 20th Cent. one.
Thanks for the correction.
Back to Speakeasy forum
(Page 1 of 4)