I've always viewed the Net Neutrality argument in the same way as the article's author does: It's a solution to a HYPOTHETICAL problem!
Where, but where are all of these ISP abuses that spur on this debate? I have Time Warner service. I have no particular love for them as a service provider, but I don't see that they are impinging in any way my ability to do what I need to do online, and that includes Netflix streaming (in HD) to my Roku box in prime time. Sure, I'd like to pay less and get more bandwidth, but for now, it serves my purposes.
The FCC sticking its nose in is really the slippery slope. People might say that's hypothetical, too, but with the FCC, we have more than ample evidence of what they can and have done in the regulatory mode, and I'm talking CONTENT regulation, not just the nuts and bolts of infrastructure and delivery.
To top it off, it is, by its nature, a political body. Whatever party has the executive branch has the majority of FCC governors. So, while that may make you feel good this year, it might not make you feel so good next year, or the next election cycle.
If I start to see rampant abuses of traffic discrimination that affect my life, I'll be right there with you neutrality advocates. But for god's sake, the Net is one of the last vestiges of real freedom in the world today, and the best hope for freedom in places where freedom of expression doesn't really exist. The less we have governments meddle in it, the better. For now, I see the argument as a solution in need of a problem, and that's never a good thing.
I'm not here to argue that major ISP's are righteous and always looking out for the consumer. Far from it. But that's what the marketplace is for.
If there is to be any overt regulation on the internet in this country (US), I'd prefer it come from 435 elected representatives and/or 100 senators who have to answer to constituents, not a supposedly independent governmental body of 5 commissioners who have political obligations but not to any particular constituents.
What are your thoughts on this article against the new FCC Net Neutrality regulations?
http://hustlebear.com/2011/01/05/why-net-neutrality-regulation-is-the-path-to-ending-net-neutrality/

Chowhound
Comic Vine
GameFAQs
GameSpot
Giant Bomb
TechRepublic