General discussion

A House Bill we can all agree on!

Discussion is locked
Reply to: A House Bill we can all agree on!
PLEASE NOTE: Do not post advertisements, offensive materials, profanity, or personal attacks. Please remember to be considerate of other members. If you are new to the CNET Forums, please read our CNET Forums FAQ. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Reporting: A House Bill we can all agree on!
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
- Collapse -
Oh, we can all agree on it, Dave,...

...while recognizing that it'll do about as much to eliminate spyware as the CAN-SPAM act has done to eliminate spam. In a battle between law and technology, technology usually wins, as it moves faster than the law.

As I write this, I'm sure that the spyware makers are preparing to move their operations offshore, where the law is of no concern to them. Sad

The best defense against scumware remains what it's always been - an aware, informed computer user equipped with a large dose of cynicism about what he or she is putting on his/her PC and the tools to block or remove the trash that does get on the PC.


"Against stupidity, the gods themselves rage in vain."
- Heinrich Schiller

- Collapse -
Re: we can all agree on it - I'm probably naive, Paul,but...

I'm hoping this may eventually mean that Adaware goes out of business... (Not that I dislike them -- they perform a valuable service that I wish weren't necessary -- much like an endodontist!)

-- Dave K, Speakeasy Moderator
click here to email

The opinions expressed above are my own,
and do not necessarily reflect those of CNET!

- Collapse -
Re: we can all agree on it - I'm probably naive, Paul,but...

I agree with Dave that a law should be established to punish people who install spyware on our computers. If they move offshore, so be it. Adware is a different story. It's what allows many sites to provides services or information free of charge. If adware disappears, so does free web surfing, to a certain extent.

- Collapse -
I'll say!

MOST "spyware" is already legitimate within the wording of the law because knowledge of its inclusion is within the end user's knowledge frame references BUT most of those users can not be bothered to read the EULA and thus miss the information.

How many AV Application publishers have gone out of business because malware such as virus and worms were illegal?

Of course, if it makes anyone "feel good" it has served its purpose and function.

- Collapse -
"I'm probably naive, Paul,but..." - yes, you are.

This bill will do NOTHING to eliminate spyware/adware. It's unenforceable against offshore companies (OMG - who'll protest the outsourcing of the American spyware/adware industry?). Wink

Jim notes that adware may help make free what otherwise be charged for. True enough, but it's like traffic radar - if they have the right to put this stuff on my PC, I have the right to run AdAware and Spybot to eliminate it. As for Ed's remark that this will make many people "feel good", well, that's all it will do. There are way too many appeals to emotionality over substance these days anyway...

CNET Forums