Speakeasy forum

General discussion

A good idea.

by critic411 / November 24, 2008 9:18 PM PST
Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: A good idea.
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: A good idea.
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
(NT) sounds like boot strap technology.
by James Denison / November 24, 2008 10:15 PM PST
In reply to: A good idea.
Collapse -
I guess I don't understand how it works...
by EdHannigan / November 24, 2008 10:26 PM PST
In reply to: A good idea.

but I am suspecting the energy gained equals the energy lost somewhere else in the system, so not very good. It would be nice to see an explanation fo how it works.

I wonder that no one is trying to reclaim the heat lost in running a hybrid engine to recharge.

Collapse -
You know those little radios that you wind up?
by critic411 / November 24, 2008 10:36 PM PST
Collapse -
Hmmm....
by EdHannigan / November 24, 2008 11:05 PM PST
Conventional shock absorbers simply dissipate this energy as heat.

Have to think about that. Seems right, but I am unsure. Need a physics whiz here.
Collapse -
Piezoelecrtrics or thermocouples perhaps?
by EdHannigan / November 25, 2008 1:55 AM PST
In reply to: Hmmm....

I would think anything mechanical would result in a net loss of energy and not be using heat that would otherwise be dissipated.

But, as I said, need a phys whiz.

Collapse -
?????????
by critic411 / November 25, 2008 1:56 AM PST

You're asking the wrong guy !!!

Mr. Wizard, Mr. Wizard !!!!

Collapse -
(NT) Dr. Bill perhaps????
by EdHannigan / November 25, 2008 1:59 AM PST
In reply to: ?????????
Collapse -
Need to account for the energy cost of manufacture, etc.....
by EdHannigan / November 25, 2008 1:58 AM PST

To make sure it's cost effective like they claim. That is often overlooked.

Collapse -
More electricity from heavier vehicles ?
by grimgraphix / November 25, 2008 1:21 AM PST
In reply to: A good idea.

Interesting concept. I'd like to see how it works.

Simply making electricity from the movement of a shock will work... but to get more energy, the distance traveled by the mechanical power generation stroke of a shock would have to be increased... or large volumes of air would need to be compressed and passed through a generating turbine. But since a shock absorber is designed to limit bounce and travel of a vehicle as it moves, then it must be an interesting mechanism that both collects the energy and delivers a smooth ride. If that is the way it works.

Thanks for posting this interesting link.

Collapse -
Dr. Bill...
by EdHannigan / November 25, 2008 10:46 PM PST
In reply to: A good idea.

Have anything to add?

Collapse -
You know he's a medical Dr,
by critic411 / November 25, 2008 11:08 PM PST
In reply to: Dr. Bill...

not of physics?

Collapse -
(NT) True, but he knows a lot....
by EdHannigan / November 25, 2008 11:11 PM PST
Collapse -
I'm not an enginear, but
by JP Bill / November 25, 2008 11:23 PM PST
In reply to: A good idea.
Collapse -
Neither me nor a "enginear" neither.
by drpruner / November 26, 2008 10:25 AM PST
Happy
I think this is the key to both devices:
"A processing device can be included to control the flow of electric energy from the linear generator to the battery."

If the intent is to recapture all the outgoing energy, then it's an attempt to build a perpetual-motion machine. It won't work; only mine does, and I'm keeping it secret. Happy
Seriously, with technology almost any small motion (kinetic energy) can be converted into a charging current (electrical energy) and stored in a battery (chemical energy). The Tufts and GA Tech devices should extend the miles driven. If the saving on the extension exceeds the cost of the device, we're home free. And, as the other link implied, anything that makes electric cars more attractive to the masses is a good thing.

Good catch, BTW. What got you to the Georgia site?
Collapse -
What got you to the Georgia site?
by JP Bill / November 26, 2008 11:22 AM PST
Collapse -
Thanks. I see your query; I always forget
by drpruner / November 26, 2008 11:31 AM PST

to be that specific.
BTW Cosby can't make jokes about his alma mammy anymore, now that Tufts is cutting-edge.

Popular Forums
icon
Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
icon
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
icon
Laptops 21,181 discussions
icon
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
icon
Phones 17,137 discussions
icon
Security 31,287 discussions
icon
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
icon
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
icon
Windows 10 2,657 discussions

Does BMW or Volvo do it best?

Pint-size luxury and funky style

Shopping for a new car this weekend? See how the BMW X2 stacks up against the Volvo XC40 in our side-by-side comparison.