Speakeasy forum

General discussion

a diferent union story

by Mark5019 / February 23, 2005 9:42 PM PST

Recalcitrant Teamsters Union Faces New Federal Charges for Abuse of Anheuser Busch Workers
Union officials thumb noses at NLRB settlement agreement, refuse to provide complete audited statement of union expenditures

FOR RELEASE: February 22, 2005

E-mail this page
Free e-mail alerts
Fairfield, Calif. (February 22, 2005) - A local employee of Anheuser Busch has filed a fourth round of federal charges against a recalcitrant Teamsters union Local for again violating the terms of a settlement agreement by failing to provide an audited statement detailing how workers? forced union dues are spent.

Catherine Anderson, a part-time employee at Anheuser Busch?s Fairfield facility, filed the unfair labor practice charges at the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) with free legal aid from National Right to Work Foundation attorneys. Teamsters union local 896 officials have repeatedly committed unfair labor practices and have reneged on settlement agreements.

Union officials recently provided workers with a financial ?statement? consisting of pages 10-13 of a larger report on the union?s expenditures. These fragments are a ?schedule? of expenses claiming an unsubstantiated 96.06% of union dues money was spent on ?collective bargaining? costs. This ?schedule? does not provide any financial disclosure to justify the affiliation fees with the Teamsters International union and two Teamsters International union councils. Teamsters officials also continue to claim that 100% of union staff salary and overhead costs are chargeable to nonmembers, even though the disclosure shows resources were spent on non-chargeable activities. Anderson?s complaint challenges both claims.

As a result of earlier federal charges filed by Anderson and a co-worker in July 2003, September 2004, and October 2004, Teamsters union local 896 officials settled the cases with a requirement that they properly inform workers of their right to refrain from financially supporting the union?s political and ideological causes. Teamsters officials had also agreed to cease illegal threats to have workers fired for refusal


http://www.nrtw.org/b/nr_381.php

Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: a diferent union story
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: a diferent union story
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
what's different about that?
by Dick White / February 23, 2005 10:00 PM PST
In reply to: a diferent union story

sounds like business as usual (or at least what unions regard as "usual").

dw

Collapse -
(NT) (NT) i was trying to be sarcastic
by Mark5019 / February 23, 2005 10:18 PM PST
Collapse -
(NT) (NT) You beat me to it!
by Evie / February 23, 2005 10:01 PM PST
In reply to: a diferent union story
Collapse -
(NT) (NT) nyah nyah... (and a good morning to you, Evie) ;-)
by Dick White / February 23, 2005 10:02 PM PST
Collapse -
Hey ...
by Evie / February 23, 2005 10:06 PM PST

... start your own Walmart Union thread (oh right ... you have started more than one you could regurg). No need to hijack Mark's thread exposing the abuse of another union!

Collapse -
(NT) (NT) Yes Maam, you da man!
by JP Bill / February 23, 2005 10:10 PM PST
In reply to: Hey ...
Collapse -
(NT) (NT) evie what do you expect from a union lover
by Mark5019 / February 23, 2005 10:19 PM PST
In reply to: Hey ...
Collapse -
(NT) (NT) and woopty doo
by Mark5019 / February 23, 2005 10:18 PM PST
Popular Forums
icon
Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
icon
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
icon
Laptops 21,181 discussions
icon
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
icon
Phones 17,137 discussions
icon
Security 31,287 discussions
icon
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
icon
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
icon
Windows 10 2,657 discussions

GIVEAWAY

Turn up the volume with our Apple Byte sweeps!

Two lucky winners will take home the coveted smart speaker that lets Siri help you around your connected house. This sweepstake ends Feb. 25, 2018.