THEN he did al-Qaeda?s dirty work?
But I guess you're saying//hinting he was doing al-Qaeda?s dirty work all along.
Got proof?
![]() | Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years. Thanks, CNET Support |
Discussion is locked
THEN he did al-Qaeda?s dirty work?
But I guess you're saying//hinting he was doing al-Qaeda?s dirty work all along.
Got proof?
He was an al-Qaeda operative long before we invaded. Look him up. That can be your project.
and believed what You say, i would rush right over to see the President.
HE would love to be able to "directly link" Saddam with al-Qaeda
Just because we don't have a Notarized, signed by Saddam document that there was no involvement between him and Al Quaeda, doesn't mean there wasn't. The Mideast doesn't work that way. Only the terminally naive think so.
makes it false
im new here but it seems that eds post looks kinda true why the hostility ?
then i humbly suggest that maybe you should alter the way you percieve or interperate posts here, try not to read between the lines and possibly sit a little longer on the sidelines 'til the view improves....
and please, this is not to to be seen as me say that you aren't welcome here...
jonah "my 'email this member' option is enabled" jones
.,
i was referring to you and i have read past posts.
and the reason i would rather have it non email as it cant be misinterpreted if we all read it here no way to alter what was said.
What I believe is not important. In his zinger, Bill implied that I might not believe what I say. I do. I don't claim that my believing it makes it so.
The story I posted was from the Times of London I believe? A little research will show that this guy was involved in setting up the terrorist camps that we destroyed after 9/11. He was active in al-Qaeda before the Iraq invasion.
That's all. Not trying to "prove" anything to anyone. You may draw your own conclusions.
aside from the fact that it was a personal attack of some sort.
I believe and say? Do you doubt the news To what exactly are you referring?
I'm not going to tell you.
You figure it out.
That's your project for the day.
if i ask you if you believe in god, i'm not "claiming" you don't,,,,
.,
though a Pentagon outfit did try to create "evidence" of such links. Meanwhile, this has clearly crossed the line to politics so I'm locking the thread -- that's also why I'm not posting a link to the Pentagon Inspector General's report supporting what I just said, though you can Google for it if you want.
-- Dave K, Speakeasy Moderator
click here to email semods4@yahoo.com
The opinions expressed above are my own,
and do not necessarily reflect those of CNET!
Abd al-Hadi al-Iraqi? I doubt it very much, but if so let's see a link. Are you saying he was not an al-Qaeda operative in the Nineties?
I am not claiming a direct link between Saddam and al-Qaeda, but there were links; that is undeniable. Saddam was not an innocent little lamb when it came to terrorism.
He joined al-Qaeda AFTER the invasion and because he was coming FROM Iran, means nothing. You do know that he is INNOCENT until proven guilty.
if you enable the "email this member" option your email address is not made public
having said that, i remind you it is only an option...
jonah
.,