Mac Hardware forum

General discussion

3GB of RAM vs. two 1GB sticks

by tleMega / December 10, 2007 10:03 AM PST

Just as a random note here, but my MBP apparently shipped this morning, arrived at the depot, had the casing fixed, and is currently en route to my Apple Store. Speedy for Apple repairs.

Anyway, when it comes back, I am going to see whether or not I should install an additional gig of memory into it, bumping it from 2GB to 3. I know that Apple and most people say RAM pairing is more beneficial, but didn't OWC or somebody test that in some of the recent MacBooks, 3GB was slightly better than 2GB? I just want to know what everyone's thoughts are on this. I plan to go to an authorized Apple tech and have a 320GB HD installed. I want to have my MBP maxed out to the limits, since I will need all the power and storage available to me.

Also, will 3GB work better overall than 2GB? I have had pretty good performance with 2GB, but I'm hoping an increase will improve some performance. Or could the uneven pairing cause a small drop in performance? What happened to the old saying "the more the merrier"? Used to apply to RAM.

Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: 3GB of RAM vs. two 1GB sticks
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: 3GB of RAM vs. two 1GB sticks
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
Just links to fill the void.
by R. Proffitt Forum moderator / December 10, 2007 10:15 AM PST
Collapse -
I'm not running a Santa Rosa system.
by tleMega / December 10, 2007 10:21 AM PST

Mine's a 2.16Ghz model, with the pre-Santa Rosa board and ATI graphics. I just read some more on this link I found a little while ago, and if some of the posters are right, Leopard could utilize 4GB of RAM in the 64-bit environment even though my MBP would only accept 3 as the max.

So theoretically, the system could actually use all 4GB and the added bonus of the pairing because of the 64-bit. It wouldn't have to "cram it all in a 32-bit environment". Interesting. Even without the environment limitations and all, it would use two 2GB sticks and report as 3, leaving the 4th unused. But you could still benefit from the dual bandwidth I'm guessing. But I'm just assuming that this one article is correct. Being without a functional MBP to test on, I can't really say. What do you guys say?

Popular Forums
Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
Laptops 21,181 discussions
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
Phones 17,137 discussions
Security 31,287 discussions
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
Windows 10 2,657 discussions


Help, my PC with Windows 10 won't shut down properly

Since upgrading to Windows 10 my computer won't shut down properly. I use the menu button shutdown and the screen goes blank, but the system does not fully shut down. The only way to get it to shut down is to hold the physical power button down till it shuts down. Any suggestions?